2023
DOI: 10.1097/iae.0000000000003846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of New Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulae in Eyes Undergoing Silicone Oil Removal/Pars Plana Vitrectomy-Cataract Surgery

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.Both new and conventional formulas with second linear version of the Wang–Koch adjustment demonstrated satisfactory performance in combined surgery, with BUII exhibiting the best performance. However, patients with primary retinal detachment showed the least favorable refractive outcomes, and new formulas also failed to significantly improve the prediction accuracy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that the lens constants on iolcon.org used to calculate the BU2 predictions for the present study, are not well optimized for use in eyes with prior SB. Although BU2 has been found to perform better than other formulas in eyes with concomitant PPV and cataract surgery, 13 it is possible that the changes in the ACD/AL ratio identified in the present study perturb the effective lens position calculation for the BU2 formula in an unnatural way, thereby making the formula's predictions less accurate. Finally, the increased variability could be related to our inclusion of eyes with less than logMAR 0.301 (≈20/40) CDVA, which would have an inherently more ambiguous refractive endpoint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…It is possible that the lens constants on iolcon.org used to calculate the BU2 predictions for the present study, are not well optimized for use in eyes with prior SB. Although BU2 has been found to perform better than other formulas in eyes with concomitant PPV and cataract surgery, 13 it is possible that the changes in the ACD/AL ratio identified in the present study perturb the effective lens position calculation for the BU2 formula in an unnatural way, thereby making the formula's predictions less accurate. Finally, the increased variability could be related to our inclusion of eyes with less than logMAR 0.301 (≈20/40) CDVA, which would have an inherently more ambiguous refractive endpoint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%