2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2006.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of methods for field assessment of rill and ephemeral gully erosion

Abstract: To properly assess soil erosion in agricultural areas, it is necessary to determine precisely the volume of ephemeral gullies and rills in the field by using direct measurement procedures. However, little information is available on the accuracy of the different methods used. The main purpose of this paper is to provide information for a suitable assessment of rill and ephemeral gully erosion with such direct measurement methods. To achieve this objective: a) the measurement errors associated to three methods … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
93
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
93
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Accurate ground measurements of ephemeral gully erosion are frequently carried out using a microtopographic profiler, a tape or a ruler, to assess some channel cross-sections (Di Stefano and Ferro, 2011;Di Stefano et al, 2013). These ground measurements, which are simple and lowReview N o n -c o m m e r c i a l u s e o n l y cost, allow measurement of the cross-sectional areas and the reach length and calculation of the ephemeral gully volume, even if, according to Casalì et al (2006), the limit of these simple methods is due to the lack of information on the errors associated with ground measurements of the cross-sections.…”
Section: Rill and Gully Erosion Measurement By Ground Monitoring Techmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate ground measurements of ephemeral gully erosion are frequently carried out using a microtopographic profiler, a tape or a ruler, to assess some channel cross-sections (Di Stefano and Ferro, 2011;Di Stefano et al, 2013). These ground measurements, which are simple and lowReview N o n -c o m m e r c i a l u s e o n l y cost, allow measurement of the cross-sectional areas and the reach length and calculation of the ephemeral gully volume, even if, according to Casalì et al (2006), the limit of these simple methods is due to the lack of information on the errors associated with ground measurements of the cross-sections.…”
Section: Rill and Gully Erosion Measurement By Ground Monitoring Techmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various techniques have been applied for measuring, mapping and monitoring gully erosion accordingly. Compared with conventional techniques (e.g., ruler, tape, microtopographic profilers [13], poles, total stations [14], pins [15] and differential GPS [16,17]), which are time-consuming for achieving high accuracy in field surveys at a small scale, the development of remote sensing techniques has provided an efficient method to obtain spatially continuous gully information over large scales for different time periods. Classical aerial photography has been effectively employed for large-scale areas and long-term investigations, but with low spatial and temporal resolution [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gully erosion causes more significant soil loss and soil degradation compared with hillslope erosion [42]. There are numerous techniques for monitoring and quantification of gully erosion, such as ruler, tape, microtopographic profilers [43], poles, total stations [44], pins [45], differential GPS [11,46], terrestrial laser scanners [47], stereoscopic photogrammetry on ground [48], aerial photographs [49,50], visual analysis of satellite images [51,52], object-oriented analysis [53], 3D photo-reconstruction [44,54], and unmanned aerial vehicles [55]. Analysis of satellite images combined with field validation has proven to be an excellent and practical approach for mapping of gully features and assessing gully erosion over large areas [10,56].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%