2017
DOI: 10.4103/2349-5006.198595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of measurements of foramen magnum and occipital condyle as an indicator for sex determination using computed tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean length of OC in this study was 21.3±2.4 mm, which was shorter than those determined by Di et al [1] (23.6±2.0 mm) and Saluja et al [29] (22.8±2.9 mm). Females had a significantly shorter OC length than males, similar to Rai et al [30] and Kumar and Nagar [31]. In our analysis, the most prevalent type of OC classified according to its length was the moderate type which was in agreement with previous reports [18,20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The mean length of OC in this study was 21.3±2.4 mm, which was shorter than those determined by Di et al [1] (23.6±2.0 mm) and Saluja et al [29] (22.8±2.9 mm). Females had a significantly shorter OC length than males, similar to Rai et al [30] and Kumar and Nagar [31]. In our analysis, the most prevalent type of OC classified according to its length was the moderate type which was in agreement with previous reports [18,20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, the average OC-H was 7.4±1.1 mm, which was lesser than those reported previously [ 1 , 30 ]. This data can be used to determine how deep the OC must be drilled [ 14 ] and the successful insertion of screws during occipitocervical fixation [ 30 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They measured foramen magnum length and width, length, width, anterior and posterior intercondylar distance, and bicondylar width, concluding that all measured diameters were statistically significantly larger in men than in women. They also performed a discriminant functional analysis that showed 91% accuracy for male gender and 97% accuracy for female gender in sexual determination ( Rai et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gender differences in the human cranium are unique to each population and may be influenced by genetic, environmental and socio-economic factors (Gapert et al, 2009). Radiological morphometric evaluation of the basilar region of skull provides an easy method of sex determination; the computed tomography (CT) scans being a preferred diagnostic modality for this purpose (Rai et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%