2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04040-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

16
426
1
15

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 754 publications
(467 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
16
426
1
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, retrospective data have suggested that a combined modality therapy could represent an overtreatment in patients at low risk of local failure after TME alone, such as some tumours staged as T3N0 (Willett et al, 1999). In this setting, MRI plays a key role, because it can predict the CRM involvement (Beets-Tan et al, 2000), so defining the patients at higher risk of local recurrence when treated with TME plus RT (Marijnen et al, 2003), although it has been demonstrated less sensitive and specific at identifying nodal disease and vascular invasion (Brown et al, 2003;Branagan et al, 2004). Our phase I -II study was carried out in patients with LARC at high risk of recurrence, as identified by both EUS and MRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, retrospective data have suggested that a combined modality therapy could represent an overtreatment in patients at low risk of local failure after TME alone, such as some tumours staged as T3N0 (Willett et al, 1999). In this setting, MRI plays a key role, because it can predict the CRM involvement (Beets-Tan et al, 2000), so defining the patients at higher risk of local recurrence when treated with TME plus RT (Marijnen et al, 2003), although it has been demonstrated less sensitive and specific at identifying nodal disease and vascular invasion (Brown et al, 2003;Branagan et al, 2004). Our phase I -II study was carried out in patients with LARC at high risk of recurrence, as identified by both EUS and MRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the phase I study, we enrolled patients in clinical stage II or III, or requiring an abdomino-perineal resection (APR). In the phase II study, we accrued only patients at high risk of recurrence: T4, node positive or T3N0 of the lower third of the rectum and/or with circumferential resection margin (CRM) p5 mm by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Beets-Tan et al, 2000). Additional inclusion criteria were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status p2, age X18 years and adequate baseline bone marrow and organ function.…”
Section: Eligibility Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By close collaboration between the rectal surgeons and radiotherapists, it is possible to select patients who are sufficiently treated by a nondownstaging short course of preoperative radiotherapy to prevent local failure. This is presently facilitated by using phased-array pelvic MRI (Beets-Tan et al, 2001). An actuarial local recurrence rate of 2.1% at 4 years compares favourably with any reported recurrence rates in the literature in comparable patients, especially in a multi-institutional setting with regard to surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pelvic MRI scanning has been established as the investigation of choice for local staging of rectal cancer prior to surgery [13,14,15] [16,17]. This is commonly defined as disease encroaching to within 1mm of mesorectal fascia (MRF) or lower rectal cancers involving the levator-sphincter complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For patients with such features, with optimum surgery and selective use of pre-operative radiotherapy, DM relapse is Gollins approximately 6-fold greater than LR (approximately 30% vs. 5%) [6,7,28] and is now the main cause of death. MRI scanning is the pre-treatment investigation which can most reliably identify such features [13,14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%