2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of intraoral radiography, multidetector helical CT, and limited cone-beam CT for the detection of horizontal tooth root fracture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
40
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
40
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Limited CBCT (PSR 9000N; Asahi Roentgen Co., Kyoto, Japan) with 40 3 41 mm field of view (FOV) was more useful than multidetector helical computerized tomography at slice thicknesses of 0.63 mm and 1.25 mm for diagnostic imaging of horizontal tooth root fracture. 11 In a previous study, we found that limited FOV Accuitomo 80 CBCT unit (Morita, Tokyo, Japan) images obtained with a 4 3 4 cm FOV and 0.125 mm voxel size were significantly superior to intraoral images taken from different angulations in detecting HRF ex vivo. 7 Similarly, in another study, the diagnosis of the location and angulation of root fractures based on limited CBCT imaging differed significantly from diagnostic procedures based on intraoral radiographs alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…4 Limited CBCT (PSR 9000N; Asahi Roentgen Co., Kyoto, Japan) with 40 3 41 mm field of view (FOV) was more useful than multidetector helical computerized tomography at slice thicknesses of 0.63 mm and 1.25 mm for diagnostic imaging of horizontal tooth root fracture. 11 In a previous study, we found that limited FOV Accuitomo 80 CBCT unit (Morita, Tokyo, Japan) images obtained with a 4 3 4 cm FOV and 0.125 mm voxel size were significantly superior to intraoral images taken from different angulations in detecting HRF ex vivo. 7 Similarly, in another study, the diagnosis of the location and angulation of root fractures based on limited CBCT imaging differed significantly from diagnostic procedures based on intraoral radiographs alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…[5][6][7][8][9] CBCT has been used for proper diagnosis of root fractures to overcome the inherent disadvantages of anatomic superimposition. 10 CBCT has allowed dental practitioners to visualize teeth three-dimensionally and with high spatial resolution. 11 While recent studies have demonstrated the superiority of CBCT in detecting root fractures, 1,3,4,6,[12][13][14][15] there are some limitations to proper imaging when high-density materials such as guttapercha and intracanal metal posts are present.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the ROC curve, the fracture diagnosis showed an accuracy of 0.73 and 0.74 with the Orthopantomograph OP300 ® and Orthophos XG 3D ® tomographs respectively, demonstrating that both examinations performed moderately. Other studies demonstrate more satisfactory results, such as the study by Hassan et al, 8 which confirmed good performance (0.86), and Iikubo et al, 22 with an accuracy rated as excellent (0.93). As far as the present study is concerned, the CBCT examination may be considered as just a complementary examination for diagnosis and indication of treatment planning when the existence of a dental root fracture is clinically suspected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…7,8,19,21 However, even with CBCT, visualizing the fracture line is difficult and a variety of factors influence the diagnosis. Iikubo et al, 22 in a study performed with dogs obtained significant results for CBCT efficiency in the diagnosis of root fracture, with a sensitivity of 0.6, specificity of 0.91, positive predictive value of 0.90, and a negative predictive value of 0.96. They concluded that this type of examination was the most reliable among the image acquisition modes studied (i.e., conventional intraoral radiography, helical computed tomography, and CBCT).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%