2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of intracoronary ECG parameters for myocardial ischemia detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
17
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Slightly different from previously published results, icECG ST-segment shift showed a lower diagnostic accuracy (0.903±0.043 for the evaluation data versus 0.963±0.029 [ 4 ]), and was less pronounced during myocardial ischemia in the current analysis (0.915±0.972mV vs. 1.272±0.998mV). This resulted in a lower optimal cut-off level for ischemia detection at 0.279mV (compared to 0.365mV).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Slightly different from previously published results, icECG ST-segment shift showed a lower diagnostic accuracy (0.903±0.043 for the evaluation data versus 0.963±0.029 [ 4 ]), and was less pronounced during myocardial ischemia in the current analysis (0.915±0.972mV vs. 1.272±0.998mV). This resulted in a lower optimal cut-off level for ischemia detection at 0.279mV (compared to 0.365mV).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…While the duration of coronary artery occlusion was identical in the recent and the present study (i.e., 60 seconds), the other determinants of myocardial ischemia differed. Compared to the previous analysis [ 4 ], where left anterior descending coronary artery was the most frequent study vessel, the right coronary artery currently served as the most frequent study vessel, causing a relevant decrease in the myocardial area at risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations