2018
DOI: 10.1101/293696
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of genomic selection for growth and wood quality traits in two control-pollinated progeny trials using exome capture as genotyping platform in Norway spruce

Abstract: Background: Genomic selection (GS) can increase genetic gain by reducing the length of breeding cycle in forest trees. Here we genotyped 1370 control-pollinated progeny trees from 128 full-sib families in Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.), using exome capture as a genotyping platform. We used 116,765 high quality SNPs to develop genomic prediction models for tree height and wood quality traits. We assessed the impact of different genomic prediction methods, genotype-by-environment interaction (GE), gene… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(101 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, estimates of predictive accuracies based on “true breeding values” (TBV) obtained from the models with 100% of phenotypes were also estimated (Table 6) because this approach is very common in the literature (e.g., Beaulieu, Doerksen, Clément, et al, 2014; Chen et al., 2018; Lenz et al., 2017). We found higher predictive accuracy values using this approach, by about 1%–124% depending on the trait, especially when the same model was used to estimate reference true breeding values (i.e., ABLUP predicted versus ABLUP 100% phenotypes, or GBLUP predicted versus GBLUP 100% phenotypes).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, estimates of predictive accuracies based on “true breeding values” (TBV) obtained from the models with 100% of phenotypes were also estimated (Table 6) because this approach is very common in the literature (e.g., Beaulieu, Doerksen, Clément, et al, 2014; Chen et al., 2018; Lenz et al., 2017). We found higher predictive accuracy values using this approach, by about 1%–124% depending on the trait, especially when the same model was used to estimate reference true breeding values (i.e., ABLUP predicted versus ABLUP 100% phenotypes, or GBLUP predicted versus GBLUP 100% phenotypes).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After these filtering steps, a total of ~300K SNPs with MAF > 0.005 were left for population structure analysis. In our previous study [ 63 ], with filtering criteria of GQ < 6 and DP < 2 as missing, the averaged discordance estimated from 148 technical replicates was less than 1%. Thus, we considered that such filtering criteria were sufficient for downstream analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second group with 1370 full-sib progenies was planted in two northern Swedish field plantations. This group was sequenced previously [ 63 ] and was used here to validate the association signals detected from the first group. The third group with 914 full-sib progenies was planted in three southern Swedish field plantations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, an Axiom SNP genotyping array with 55K SNPs was developed for Douglas‐fir ( Pseudotsuga menziesii ) from transcriptome sequencing (Perry et al., 2020). For Norway spruce, high‐quality SNPs have been developed based on large‐scale sequence capture and have been employed for both GWAS and GS (Azaiez et al 2018; Baison et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2018; Vidalis et al 2018). Various SNP arrays have also been available for poplar and other broadleaved tree species that have been used in association genetics and GS studies (Geraldes et al., 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%