2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of FAST scan in blunt abdominal trauma in a major London trauma centre

Abstract: Patients with false negative scans, requiring therapeutic laparotomy is concerning. In unstable patients FAST may help in triaging and identifying those requiring laparotomy. Negative FAST scans do not exclude abdominal injury. Further randomised control trials are recommended if the role of FAST is to be better understood.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
31
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
31
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, initial CT scan revealed blush in 19 cases with a low rate of failed NOM (0.5%). However, patients with negative FAST had increased risk of missed intra-abdominal injuries due to the lower specificity of the test [20]. In the present study, 65% of BSI cases had negative or inconclusive FAST results, and were diagnosed mainly upon CT scan evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In our study, initial CT scan revealed blush in 19 cases with a low rate of failed NOM (0.5%). However, patients with negative FAST had increased risk of missed intra-abdominal injuries due to the lower specificity of the test [20]. In the present study, 65% of BSI cases had negative or inconclusive FAST results, and were diagnosed mainly upon CT scan evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…First, the interpretation of FAST positivity is user dependent(1618) and both the ABC score and the original MTS have FAST as a variable. Therefore, the inclusion of it in a scoring system will result in prediction that reflects the differences in FAST sensitivity and specificity at individual institutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FAST examination is one of the most common applications of POCUS, with one survey in developing countries reporting it as the second most common ultrasound application behind obstetrical use. [9] Accuracy and ease of training of FAST among physicians worldwide have been well documented, [10][11][12] with one Peruvian study reporting increased confidence in FAST scanning abilities in physicians after just 2.5 hours of ultrasound training. [13] While our overall image adequacy rate of 74% after two hours of training appears impressive, it is diffi cult to compare as other studies on POCUS applications among non-physicians are lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%