2020
DOI: 10.1002/hed.26536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of fine‐needle aspiration cytology in detecting cervical node metastasis after radiotherapy: Systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: Purpose To define the accuracy of fine‐needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in diagnosing persistent or recurrent neck metastases in previously irradiated patients. Methods The study was performed according to the PRISMA‐DTA guidelines. Results A total of 382 FNACs were used for calculation of diagnostic accuracy parameters. The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity in detecting malignant nodes were 69.1% (95% CI: 56.3%‐80.7%; I2 = 79.5%) and 84.2% (95% CI: 71.8%‐93.5%; I2 = 87.0%), respectively. Cumulative … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crucially, the study elucidated that there were no significant differences in the diagnostic performance of these imaging modalities in assessing cervical LNM 43 . Another separate meta‐analysis conveyed that FNAC exhibited a sensitivity of 69.1% and a specificity of 84.2% in diagnosing cervical LNM, findings that align closely with the previously mentioned imaging modalities 45 . LS was reported to hold a sensitivity of 100.0%, a specificity of 81.25%, and an accuracy of 96.66% in the preoperative detection of cervical LNM in patients with OSCC 46 .…”
Section: Neck Management For Osccsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Crucially, the study elucidated that there were no significant differences in the diagnostic performance of these imaging modalities in assessing cervical LNM 43 . Another separate meta‐analysis conveyed that FNAC exhibited a sensitivity of 69.1% and a specificity of 84.2% in diagnosing cervical LNM, findings that align closely with the previously mentioned imaging modalities 45 . LS was reported to hold a sensitivity of 100.0%, a specificity of 81.25%, and an accuracy of 96.66% in the preoperative detection of cervical LNM in patients with OSCC 46 .…”
Section: Neck Management For Osccsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…43 Another separate meta-analysis conveyed that FNAC exhibited a sensitivity of 69.1% and a specificity of 84.2% in diagnosing cervical LNM, findings that align closely with the previously mentioned imaging modalities. 45 LS was reported to hold a sensitivity of 100.0%, a specificity of 81.25%, and an accuracy of 96.66% in the preoperative detection of cervical LNM in patients with OSCC. 46 However, it should be noted that this study was predicated on relatively small sample size, a factor that may potentially introduce significant bias.…”
Section: Preoperative Assessment Of Clnsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…163,1096 Ultrasound with fine needle aspiration cytology in the assessment of disease response cannot be relied upon in isolation. 1097 Other potential strategies in this situation that require more evaluation include diffusion-weighted imaging MRI, 1098 or the use of circulating biomarkers such as tumour DNA or HPV antigens to detect disease persistence. 1099 Currently, a therapeutic neck dissection is generally recommended in advanced N 3 HPV-positive or HPV-negative SCC with an equivocal response, because there is little evidence to modify the standard of care with a second, delayed PET-CT scan.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasound with fine needle aspiration cytology in the assessment of disease response cannot be relied upon in isolation. 1097 Other potential strategies in this situation that require more evaluation include diffusion-weighted imaging MRI, 1098 or the use of circulating biomarkers such as tumour DNA or HPV antigens to detect disease persistence. 1099…”
Section: Treatment Of Clinically Staged Node-positive Neckmentioning
confidence: 99%