2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2002.01412.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of eosinophils and eosinophil cationic protein to predict steroid improvement in asthma

Abstract: Our findings show that baseline values of the clinical parameters used as outcome parameters are the major predictors of clinical response to corticosteroids. Eosinophil percentage in blood or sputum adds to this, whereas ECP provides no additional information. Correct prediction of clinical response in an individual patient, however, remains poor with our currently used clinical and inflammatory parameters.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
70
1
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
70
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…(15) The authors suggested that higher IgE levels indicate the presence of Serum total IgE levels and total eosinophil counts: relationship with treatment response in patients with acute asthma 27 mation, adds to this, whereas ECP provides no additional information. (27) The peripheral blood eosinophil count, the serum ECP concentration, and the ECP/eosinophil ratio have been shown to be significantly higher during acute asthma exacerbations than during clinical remission. (28) Other authors reported that a high blood eosinophil count at baseline and an increase in sputum eosinophil count after the reduction of corticosteroids were predictors of loss of asthma control.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(15) The authors suggested that higher IgE levels indicate the presence of Serum total IgE levels and total eosinophil counts: relationship with treatment response in patients with acute asthma 27 mation, adds to this, whereas ECP provides no additional information. (27) The peripheral blood eosinophil count, the serum ECP concentration, and the ECP/eosinophil ratio have been shown to be significantly higher during acute asthma exacerbations than during clinical remission. (28) Other authors reported that a high blood eosinophil count at baseline and an increase in sputum eosinophil count after the reduction of corticosteroids were predictors of loss of asthma control.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In COPD and asthma, eosinophilic rather than neutrophilic inflammatory activity predicts favourable response to ICS [5,[8][9][10]. Nitric oxide output is associated mainly with eosinophilic airway inflammation [31][32][33], whereas LTB 4 (chemotactic factor for neutrophils) and 8-isoprostane (marker of lipid peroxidation) are associated with neutrophilic inflammation [18,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICS are less effective in COPD than in asthma, but some subjects with COPD gain from ICS by improvement in their lung function and health status [3]. High levels of markers of eosinophilic inflammation, like exhaled NO concentration [4] and sputum eosinophils [5], predict favourable response to ICS in asthma, and these markers may also be useful in titrating the ICS dose in long-term asthma management [6,7]. There are also some studies showing that high levels of sputum eosinophils in COPD predict favourable response to a short course of oral prednisolone [8] or ICS [9,10], but the role of exhaled NO or inflammatory markers in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) in predicting response to ICS in COPD is not known.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study from LITTLE et al [22] demonstrated that sputum eosinophilia (w3%) predicted improvement in FEV1 in asthmatic subjects already on inhaled steroids (median dose equivalent to 800 mg of inhaled beclomethasone) after treatment with oral prednisolone (30 mg?day -1 ) for 2 weeks with a sensitivity of 54% and specificity of 76%. Subsequently, MEIJER et al [23] examined the value of clinical parameters (FEV1, the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in the FEV1 (PC20) and asthma quality-of-life questionnaire), and inflammatory markers in blood and sputum (eosinophils and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP)) or exhaled nitric oxide to predict benefit from corticosteroid treatment. In this double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study, 120 subjects with uncontrolled asthma were randomised to receiving a 2-week treatment with either prednisolone 30 mg?day -1 , fluticasone propionate 1,000 mg b.i.d.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%