2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of Different Dental Age Assessment Methods to Determine Chronological Age among Malay Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The previous study in Malay children (Mongoloid race) found that the Willems method showed overestimation in age groups of 5 and 15 years, and underestimation in age groups of 10 years in both sexes, without a significant statistical difference (Ismail et al 2018). Unlike the results of the previous study in Malay children, there was an underestimation of age observed in the present study, both boys and girls.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The previous study in Malay children (Mongoloid race) found that the Willems method showed overestimation in age groups of 5 and 15 years, and underestimation in age groups of 10 years in both sexes, without a significant statistical difference (Ismail et al 2018). Unlike the results of the previous study in Malay children, there was an underestimation of age observed in the present study, both boys and girls.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Since the original publication of The London Atlas in form of a scientific article in 2010 ( 1 ), several population-specific validation studies have corroborated the applicability of the method. In the scientific literature, there are two main strategies to test the applicability of the London Atlas: by assessing the deciduous and permanent dentition among individuals below the age of 16 years ( 24 ), and by assessing the development of third molars among individuals between 16 and 23 years ( 4 ). In children, the applicability of the London Atlas is known for its credibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Penelitian menunjukkan terdapat under-estimasi pada kategori usia 10 dan 15 tahun, sedangkan pada grup usia 5 tahun over-estimasi. 21 Adanya over-estimasi atau under-estimasi ini mungkin dapat disebabkan karena sampel yang diteliti masih kategori anak-anak (6-13 tahun) dimana pada usia tersebut adalah gigi masih dalam pertumbuhan dan perkembangan, berbeda apabila sampel yang diteliti kategori usia dewasa dimana pada usia tersebut perkembnagan gigi mayoritas sudah sampai pada tahap erupsi sempurna sehingga kemungkinan hasil yang didapatkan akan sama. Studi mengenai pola mineralisasi gigi menunjukkan bahwa tahap awal perkembangan gigi hampir sama antara laki-laki dan perempuan, dimorfisme seksual dalam tahap perkembangan gigi terjadi diantara tahap akhir pembentukan mahkota ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE dan terus meningkat selama tahap pembentukan akar.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified