2009
DOI: 10.1086/598198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests forHelicobacter pylori:A Reappraisal

Abstract: Histological examination and rapid urease testing showed excellent diagnostic reliability. The stool test seems to be a good, noninvasive alternative to endoscopy-based tests. By contrast, the infrared-based UBT evaluated in our study showed a lower than expected performance, which was partially corrected when the cutoff value for the test was recalculated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
89
2
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
89
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies have also reported high false-positive rates for UBT in non-bleeding patients in some specific settings [32]. We are aware of this limitation of our study, although other authors have found this unexpected falsepositive rate and low specificity [33]. Technical aspects in the procedure like pretreatment with citric acid should be improved in order to increase these suboptimal results [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Some studies have also reported high false-positive rates for UBT in non-bleeding patients in some specific settings [32]. We are aware of this limitation of our study, although other authors have found this unexpected falsepositive rate and low specificity [33]. Technical aspects in the procedure like pretreatment with citric acid should be improved in order to increase these suboptimal results [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Amongst the non invasive tests are serologic test for antibodies, faecal bacteria detection and urea breath test [19]. The urea breath test is based on the generation of ammonia by bacteria urease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study, we found a very high rate of false-positive results and low specificity with a commercially available urea breath test (UBT), specifically UBiT-100 mg (Otsuka, Barcelona, Spain), for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) when compared with the combination of histology, stool test, rapid urease test (RUT) and culture. 1 As this finding was totally unexpected, we performed a number of control measurements to confirm its validity. The analysis led us to hypothesize that the false-positive results may be attributable to the omission of the pre-administration of citric acid, within the UBiT protocol.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%