2018
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291718003781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of diagnostic classification algorithms using cognitive-, electrophysiological-, and neuroanatomical data in antipsychotic-naïve schizophrenia patients

Abstract: BackgroundA wealth of clinical studies have identified objective biomarkers, which separate schizophrenia patients from healthy controls on a group level, but current diagnostic systems solely include clinical symptoms. In this study, we investigate if machine learning algorithms on multimodal data can serve as a framework for clinical translation.MethodsForty-six antipsychotic-naïve, first-episode schizophrenia patients and 58 controls underwent neurocognitive tests, electrophysiology, and magnetic resonance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some other studies did not find an impairment in sensory gating in FEP (150)(151)(152)(153), FES (154,155), and HR (150,151,154,156,157) subjects. Furthermore, a study involving the innovative implementation of machine learning (ML) to distinguish FES from HCs with P50-related measures (amplitude and ratio), in addition to other neuroimaging and clinical evaluations, highlighted that this EEG-index did not contribute significantly to the discrimination performed by the mathematical model (158).…”
Section: P50mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some other studies did not find an impairment in sensory gating in FEP (150)(151)(152)(153), FES (154,155), and HR (150,151,154,156,157) subjects. Furthermore, a study involving the innovative implementation of machine learning (ML) to distinguish FES from HCs with P50-related measures (amplitude and ratio), in addition to other neuroimaging and clinical evaluations, highlighted that this EEG-index did not contribute significantly to the discrimination performed by the mathematical model (158).…”
Section: P50mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent longitudinal study (255), machine learning was used to discriminate two subgroups of FEP subjects, according to changes in dMMN amplitude, revealing that subjects with improvement of dMMN had better clinical, cognitive, and functional follow-up outcomes than those with worsening of dMMN (255). However, another study did not find a significant contribution of electrophysiological indices, such as P50 and MMN, for the discrimination between FES and HCs (158).…”
Section: Current and Future Perspective On The Employment Of Eeg-indices In Clinical Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…refs. 16,19,20 ), and a complete list of publications is provided at www.cinsr.dk. Patients in cohort A had been randomized to treatment with either risperidone or zuclopenthixol for 3 months.…”
Section: Participants and Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, advances have been made towards combining data from multiple modalities in order to improve prediction. Clinical studies applying multimodal approaches are scarce, but may improve classification of schizophrenia patients from healthy controls compared to unimodal approaches 15 , although findings are equivocal 16 . We recently reported that the treatment response of psychopathologically indistinguishable patient subgroups was significantly predicted by an ML model based on cognitive and electrophysiological data 17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, however, there are few studies of multimodal MRI integration entirely based on samples of first-episode patients. Two examples are the study by Peruzzo et al (2015), which used small sample sizes or the more recent study by Ebdrup et al (2018), which found no predictive power in the MRI datasets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%