The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-015-0535-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the identification and characterization of traumatic solid organ lesions in children: a retrospective comparison with baseline US and CE-MDCT

Abstract: CEUS is more sensitive and accurate than baseline US and almost as sensitive as CT in the identification and characterization of solid organs lesions in blunt abdominal trauma. CT is more sensitive and accurate than CEUS in identifying prognostic indicators, as active bleeding and urinoma. CEUS should be considered as a useful tool in the assessment and monitoring of blunt abdominal trauma in children.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…29 CEUS is perfectly suited for the follow-up of patients with paediatric trauma, without the need for ionizing radiation, sedation and nephrotoxic contrast agents and no compromise in terms of diagnostic accuracy. 31 A recently published retrospective analysis of 73 haemodynamically stable children sustaining minor abdominal trauma compared CEUS with baseline ultrasonography and CT. 37 In this study, ultrasonography detected only 26/67 (38.8%) parenchymal traumatic lesions involving the liver, spleen and kidneys, whereas CEUS was concordant with CT in every patient ( Figure 1). CEUS also identified active parenchymal bleeding in 50% of cases seen on CT and one case of partial devascularization.…”
Section: Clinical Applications Blunt Abdominal Traumamentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…29 CEUS is perfectly suited for the follow-up of patients with paediatric trauma, without the need for ionizing radiation, sedation and nephrotoxic contrast agents and no compromise in terms of diagnostic accuracy. 31 A recently published retrospective analysis of 73 haemodynamically stable children sustaining minor abdominal trauma compared CEUS with baseline ultrasonography and CT. 37 In this study, ultrasonography detected only 26/67 (38.8%) parenchymal traumatic lesions involving the liver, spleen and kidneys, whereas CEUS was concordant with CT in every patient ( Figure 1). CEUS also identified active parenchymal bleeding in 50% of cases seen on CT and one case of partial devascularization.…”
Section: Clinical Applications Blunt Abdominal Traumamentioning
confidence: 53%
“…CEUS also identified active parenchymal bleeding in 50% of cases seen on CT and one case of partial devascularization. 37 CEUS has been shown to detail renal cortical necrosis in a child following blunt abdominal trauma. CEUS findings were correlated and confirmed by gadolinium-enhanced MRI, indicating its excellent spatial resolution.…”
Section: Clinical Applications Blunt Abdominal Traumamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in many experiences, CEUS showed some limits because, besides being operator-dependent, it has a low panoramicity and does not provide important information about possible complications, such as the presence of bilomas, abscesses, urinary tract, and vascular lesions [10][11][12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However CEUS has shown some limits, such as the fact that it is operator-dependent, has a low panoramicity, the small operating window reducing the visibility, and its low capability to give useful information about some complications, such as abscesses, bilomas, lesions to the urinary tract and vascular complications, requiring the use of CE-CT [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In trauma, CEUS has shown to be a reliable tool in the diagnosis and follow-up of liver, spleen and renal injuries in pediatric patients [147,148].…”
Section: Pediatric Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%