2020
DOI: 10.1590/pboci.2020.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Mandibular Molar Furcation Defects

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the assessment of mandibular molar furcation defects. Material and Methods: Thirty patients with furcation defects were selected, oral hygiene instructions, scaling, and root planing with ultrasonic devices and hand instruments and occlusal adjustments were performed. Pre-surgical clinical measurements were carried out at the buccal aspect of the selected mandibular molars. The horizontal furcation measurements were measured with a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) examination in periodontitis patients with furcation involvement in this study was used as the "gold standard" in consideration of previous studies which showed that there were no significant differences in the results of intraoperative examination which is the "gold standard" in measuring pocket depth and furcation involvement with CBCT. 10,11,12,13 In this study, the results of a comparative test of furcation involvement based on clinical examination, periapical radiographs and CBCT showed statistically significant differences (p=0.019), which means that there was a discrepancy between the results of clinical examinations, periapical radiographs and CBCT. It was shown that of the 9 (30%) samples that had furcation involvement clinically only 1 (3.3%) was confirmed on CBCT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) examination in periodontitis patients with furcation involvement in this study was used as the "gold standard" in consideration of previous studies which showed that there were no significant differences in the results of intraoperative examination which is the "gold standard" in measuring pocket depth and furcation involvement with CBCT. 10,11,12,13 In this study, the results of a comparative test of furcation involvement based on clinical examination, periapical radiographs and CBCT showed statistically significant differences (p=0.019), which means that there was a discrepancy between the results of clinical examinations, periapical radiographs and CBCT. It was shown that of the 9 (30%) samples that had furcation involvement clinically only 1 (3.3%) was confirmed on CBCT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%