Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of Computer Programs in Predicting Orthognathic Surgery Soft Tissue Response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
54
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A systematic review that evaluated the accuracy of various computer prediction programs at predicting soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery using 2D prediction software demonstrated that in general these software systems showed accurate prediction results (<2 mm) when compared with the actual soft tissue profile post-surgery (Kaipatur and Flores-Mir, 2009). Jones et al (2007) demonstrated that a 3mm change in facial soft tissue profile is required before it is noticed by laypeople or a specialist panel.…”
Section: Clinically Noticeable Differences Between Predictions and Acmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A systematic review that evaluated the accuracy of various computer prediction programs at predicting soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery using 2D prediction software demonstrated that in general these software systems showed accurate prediction results (<2 mm) when compared with the actual soft tissue profile post-surgery (Kaipatur and Flores-Mir, 2009). Jones et al (2007) demonstrated that a 3mm change in facial soft tissue profile is required before it is noticed by laypeople or a specialist panel.…”
Section: Clinically Noticeable Differences Between Predictions and Acmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some programs incorporate different ratios for the soft tissue response for different facial forms (Dolphin Imaging™, Dolphin Imaging Inc., California, USA) but despite the differences between the numerous available programs, the prediction of changes to the outline of the upper and lower lip seem to be the most difficult areas to predict accurately (Konstiantos et al, 1994;Chunmaneechote et al, 1999;Kaipatur and Flores-Mir., 2009;Gimenez et al, 2013).…”
Section: Computerised Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As mentioned, traditionally in cephalometrics, landmark identification errors or prediction errors have been most commonly reported by means of one-dimensional variables, such as linear-and/or angular measurements, i.e., linear measurements between two landmarks separately in either horizontal (x-axis) or in vertical (y-axis) [12][13][14][15][16][17] or degrees of angles among three points. [16][17][18] The problem associated with the reliability of linear or angular measurements is because a linear measurement is formed from two points and an angle is formed from three points.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%