2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2018.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of claim data in the identification and classification of adults with congenital heart diseases in electronic medical records

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Presence of CVD was defined as two or more separate International Classification of Disease (ICD), Ninth (ICD-9) or Tenth (ICD-10) edition diagnosis or Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes indicating either ischemic or nonischemic CVD, in either the inpatient or outpatient setting (Supplemental Table 1). Codes were selected from previously validated and utilized algorithms demonstrating a >95% specificity of single code use for coronary artery disease, peripheral arterial disease, cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, valvular disease, congenital heart disease, (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28), and >85% specificity of single code use for atrial fibrillation (29). Our study then requires two or more separate diagnostic codes to further increase specificity of our enrollment groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Presence of CVD was defined as two or more separate International Classification of Disease (ICD), Ninth (ICD-9) or Tenth (ICD-10) edition diagnosis or Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes indicating either ischemic or nonischemic CVD, in either the inpatient or outpatient setting (Supplemental Table 1). Codes were selected from previously validated and utilized algorithms demonstrating a >95% specificity of single code use for coronary artery disease, peripheral arterial disease, cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, valvular disease, congenital heart disease, (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28), and >85% specificity of single code use for atrial fibrillation (29). Our study then requires two or more separate diagnostic codes to further increase specificity of our enrollment groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, our study design was observational in nature meaning causality cannot be demonstrated. Second, there is potential misclassification of diagnoses within the ICD coding system, though codes were chosen based on rigorous review of validated claims-based algorithms (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29). We additionally required two separate diagnosis codes at two separate healthcare encounters to increase our confidence in how we defined exposure groups and cancer incidence.…”
Section: Our Findings Build Upon Prior Studies a Study Of 32095 Indiv...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, patients with valvular heart disease of probable degenerative origin often received a diagnosis of CHD. While administrative databases vary in accuracy of CHD diagnoses [43][44][45][46] it seems that in our system, the NPR is dependable for diagnosis of MI in patients with CHD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…ICD‐10 codes help classify diagnosis, but may be nonspecific, especially for adults with complex anatomy. Multiple studies have described the accuracy of ICD‐10 codes to identify ACHD patients compared to the gold standard of medical record review with variable results (Cohen et al, 2019; Khan et al, 2018; Steiner et al, 2018). Steiner et al reported reasonable accuracy of ACHD patient identification using ICD‐9 and ICD‐10 codes, but correct identification of certain lesions varied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%