1973
DOI: 10.2307/3799746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of Census Methods of Territorial Red-Winged Blackbirds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall density was one kite/l,6 km but higher near the towns (1 kite/0,8 or 0,9km). The actual density may be higher since buildings of small villages occasionally blocked the view of potential perches and roadside censuses tend to underestimate the true population (Francis 1973). The only other species which used these perches were Laughing or Turtle Doves (Streptopelia senegalensis and S. turtur).…”
Section: Early Literature Indicates That Blackshoulderedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall density was one kite/l,6 km but higher near the towns (1 kite/0,8 or 0,9km). The actual density may be higher since buildings of small villages occasionally blocked the view of potential perches and roadside censuses tend to underestimate the true population (Francis 1973). The only other species which used these perches were Laughing or Turtle Doves (Streptopelia senegalensis and S. turtur).…”
Section: Early Literature Indicates That Blackshoulderedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies attempted to resolve the problem of inexact identification using a combination of landmarks, vegetation cover, speed of a survey vehicle, bird behaviours, distances between locations and the removal of some observations to assign encounters as recaptures or new marks. Although Hewitt’s (1967) population estimates were consistent (Francis 1973), these solutions lacked standardization within and among surveys and may have contributed to unknown levels of bias in the resulting population estimates. Subsequently, the use of point coordinates for constructing capture–recapture encounter histories has not been widely adopted or applied to encounter histories with more than two encounter occasions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%