2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of blood transfusion in postpartum hemorrhage to assess maternal morbidity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transfusion rate documented in our study is comparable to that reported from the USA (7/1000 in a study from 1998 to 2011 using Nationwide Inpatient Sample data) 16 and the Burgundy region of France (6.5/1000) 13 but lower than that reported from New South Wales, Australia (14/ 1000), 7 and Finland (19.8/1000) during the delivery admission among singleton deliveries. 17 The report from New South Wales further reported a crude rate of inter-institutional variation of 6-29 per 1000, reasonably similar to the range of our crude rates (3.7-23.6 per 1000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The transfusion rate documented in our study is comparable to that reported from the USA (7/1000 in a study from 1998 to 2011 using Nationwide Inpatient Sample data) 16 and the Burgundy region of France (6.5/1000) 13 but lower than that reported from New South Wales, Australia (14/ 1000), 7 and Finland (19.8/1000) during the delivery admission among singleton deliveries. 17 The report from New South Wales further reported a crude rate of inter-institutional variation of 6-29 per 1000, reasonably similar to the range of our crude rates (3.7-23.6 per 1000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Important strengths of our study included its use of linked transfusion records from our provincial Central Transfusion Registry rather than reliance on chart abstraction, which has been shown to underestimate transfusion use. [13][14][15] Our use of a population-based database with provincially standardised data collection and quality assurance helped to ensure comparability in risk factors and other characteristics between sites. Nevertheless, our study was lacking information on the indication for transfusion, which would have been valuable in exploring patterns of between-site variation.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of bleeds .2500 mL (6/1000) was similar to a recent confidential audit (5.9/1000) 4 and the proportion transfused comparable to national reports. 6,8,[23][24][25][26] Women were managed on routine protocols and had received variable amounts of crystalloid and colloid before inclusion; therefore, the results are applicable to many maternity units and different clinical situations. Limitations are that blood loss at study enrolment is difficult to quantify and that, although the Fibtem result was not known by the clinicians, they could react to the fibrinogen result when it became available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defining the incidence of PPH, and comparing results of studies, is hampered by the lack of a standardised approach to blood loss assessment [2]. Visual estimation, although widely used, is inaccurate and often associated with under-reporting of actual blood loss, especially in cases of large volumes of PPH [3][4][5][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Systematic reviews confirm that the incidence of PPH is higher with quantitative measurement, as opposed to visual estimation and this leads to inaccurate reporting of the incidence and severity of PPH [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%