2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of bedside emergency physician performed ultrasound in diagnosing different causes of acute abdominal pain: a prospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
2
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
26
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, patients with co-morbidities presented a higher percentage of US changes compared with normal US (3-50% versus 0-6%, the extreme being represented by vascular emergencies with 50% vs. 6%). Hasani et al also showed that 41.3% of the patients with acute abdominal pain, who underwent an emergency ultrasound examination, had co-morbidities [19]. The percentage of normal US was 34% (39.3% in case of radiologist with experience) for acute nonspecific abdominal pain, concordant with the study's Hasani and the errors were at a reduced rate (2.27%) in our study compared with theirs (7%) [19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, patients with co-morbidities presented a higher percentage of US changes compared with normal US (3-50% versus 0-6%, the extreme being represented by vascular emergencies with 50% vs. 6%). Hasani et al also showed that 41.3% of the patients with acute abdominal pain, who underwent an emergency ultrasound examination, had co-morbidities [19]. The percentage of normal US was 34% (39.3% in case of radiologist with experience) for acute nonspecific abdominal pain, concordant with the study's Hasani and the errors were at a reduced rate (2.27%) in our study compared with theirs (7%) [19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Hasani et al also showed that 41.3% of the patients with acute abdominal pain, who underwent an emergency ultrasound examination, had co-morbidities [19]. The percentage of normal US was 34% (39.3% in case of radiologist with experience) for acute nonspecific abdominal pain, concordant with the study's Hasani and the errors were at a reduced rate (2.27%) in our study compared with theirs (7%) [19]. Literature data shows that experience and training in US examination (normal US -34% for highly experienced emergency physician in our study, 51.3% for emergency physicians, 39.3% for radiologists) can improve the accuracy and usefulness of the method [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies, one retrospective and the second prospective, of US evaluation specifically of patients with atypical presentation of appendicitis, atypical lab results [59], or nonspecific abdominal pain [60] were identified in the current literature. The first demonstrated US sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 71.4%, 78.5%, 94.8%, 33.3%, and 72.5%, respectively.…”
Section: Tc-99m Wbc Scan Abdomen and Pelvismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…POCUS is used as a non-invasive tool for rapid assessment of abdominal pain in emergency setting. 9,10 Physicians should consider that it is a rule in technique and the most important part of an effective POCUS is to focus on the prediagnosis obtained from history and physical examination. 11 We performed POCUS with the pre-diagnosis of renal or pelvic disorder in a 15-year-old girl with recurrent abdominal pain, anorexia and menstrual cycle irregularity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%