2014 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium 2014
DOI: 10.1109/ultsym.2014.0608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of backscatter coefficient estimation in aberrating media using different phase aberration correction strategies - A simulation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Approaches for aberration corrections include using the peak position of cross correlation with iteration methods to estimate the arrival time differences across the transducer array [74,75]. Multiple estimates of the aberration delays for a group of adjacent elements were computed in the multi-lag cross correlation method and the arrival time was estimated using least-meansquare error [76][77][78]. In order to obtain a more accurate aberration measurement profile, a 2-D spatial filter was designed to be implemented prior to the measurement to suppress off-axis signals [57].…”
Section: Phase Aberration Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches for aberration corrections include using the peak position of cross correlation with iteration methods to estimate the arrival time differences across the transducer array [74,75]. Multiple estimates of the aberration delays for a group of adjacent elements were computed in the multi-lag cross correlation method and the arrival time was estimated using least-meansquare error [76][77][78]. In order to obtain a more accurate aberration measurement profile, a 2-D spatial filter was designed to be implemented prior to the measurement to suppress off-axis signals [57].…”
Section: Phase Aberration Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first two were used because they are common methods used in the PAC literature. 13,17,18 The SCM was selected because it is based on the covariance matrix and it could possibly integrate better with the MV beamforming calculations.…”
Section: Pacmentioning
confidence: 99%