1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0046-8177(88)80080-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of and reasons for frozen sections: A correlative, retrospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparisons of accuracy and TAT for frozen sections between centers must consider differences in the types of frozen sections performed in each center [34]. Most of our TP frozen sections are biopsy specimens submitted by neurosurgeons to establish a diagnosis of an unknown pathologic process.…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Tp Frozen Section Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons of accuracy and TAT for frozen sections between centers must consider differences in the types of frozen sections performed in each center [34]. Most of our TP frozen sections are biopsy specimens submitted by neurosurgeons to establish a diagnosis of an unknown pathologic process.…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Tp Frozen Section Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18][19][20] Currently a 5 mm margin is recommended for MIS when treated by routine excision without frozen margin control. Some have demonstrated the accuracy of diagnosing melanoma using standard frozen sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), [41][42][43][44][45][46][47] while others have questioned their reliability for margin evaluation. 26,[28][29][30]34 Among experienced pathologists and surgeons, controversy exists regarding the best way to visualize the tumor histologically, a fundamental precept of the Mohs technique.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies on general surgical cases and otolaryngologic cases show similar findings with a 95 to 98% diagnostic accuracy rate, a 2 to 4% error rate (including less than 2% false negative and less than 1% false positive) and less than 4% of cases being deferred for permanent section evaluation [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Diagnostic errors may occur due to improper sampling, technical flaws, interpretive inaccuracies and in faulty communication.…”
Section: Surgeon's Expectations Of the Intraoperative Assessment Of Mmentioning
confidence: 77%