2003
DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200305001-01575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of an Electronic Pedometer in Adults With Varying Body Mass Index Levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, assembled evidence is now available from 25 articles reviewed to substantiate the claim that simple and inexpensive pedometers agree acceptably with more expensive accelerometers (median r = 0.86), direct but time‐consuming observation (median r = 0.82), estimates and measures of energy expenditure (median r = 0.68), and self‐reported physical activity (median r = 0.33) (18). Although earlier research using a different brand than that used in this study suggested that pedometers were less accurate with obese individuals (32), recent evidence has supported Yamax pedometer accuracy regardless of BMI level (33, 34). Slow walking speed has also been raised as a threat to the validity of pedometer‐assessed physical activity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…Nevertheless, assembled evidence is now available from 25 articles reviewed to substantiate the claim that simple and inexpensive pedometers agree acceptably with more expensive accelerometers (median r = 0.86), direct but time‐consuming observation (median r = 0.82), estimates and measures of energy expenditure (median r = 0.68), and self‐reported physical activity (median r = 0.33) (18). Although earlier research using a different brand than that used in this study suggested that pedometers were less accurate with obese individuals (32), recent evidence has supported Yamax pedometer accuracy regardless of BMI level (33, 34). Slow walking speed has also been raised as a threat to the validity of pedometer‐assessed physical activity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…At speeds of 54 m/min (3.2 km/hour), Digi-Walker pedometers (including the SW-200) tend to underestimate and count only about 70 to 75 % of actual steps. At speeds of 67 m/min (4.0 km/ hour) and above, the Digi-Walker pedometers appear to be considerably more accurate, counting 90 to 95 % of steps at speeds of 80 m/min (4.8 km/hour) and higher [5,13,27,30,38]. We observed that drill sergeants encourage trainees to move quickly during training activities and around the barracks areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…It has been suggested that the main threats to the validity of pedometer measurement include obesity, motorized travel, and slower walking speeds [47]. Some authors have suggested that altered gait associated with obesity or excessive movement of abdominal fat may cause false readings [48], but recent studies show conflicting evidence regarding the influence of BMI on pedometer readings [14,30,35,38]. If obesity is a challenge for accurate pedometry, it was unlikely to have been a problem in the present survey, since the average BMI was about 24 kg/m 2 , and the highest BMI was 30.8 kg/m 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walking behavior was measured via the Lifestyles Digi-Walker SW series pedometer (Schneider et al 2004;Swartz et al 2003) and the Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire (Godin et al, 1986) adapted to measure self-reported leisure-time walking in moderate and strenuous minutes (Brown and Rhodes, 2006;Tremblay et al, 2011).…”
Section: Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%