2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesf.2018.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of a smartphone pedometer application according to different speeds and mobile phone locations in a laboratory context

Abstract: BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of a smartphone application and a mechanical pedometer for step counting at different walking speeds and mobile phone locations in a laboratory context.MethodsSeventeen adults wore an iPphone6© with Runtastic Pedometer© application (RUN), at 3 different locations (belt, arm, jacket) and a pedometer (YAM) at the waist. They were asked to walk on an instrumented treadmill (reference) at various speeds (2, 4 and 6 km/h).ResultsRUN was more accurate t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The ZTM algorithm using data from smartphones attached to the hip (Samsung Galaxy S10e, Sony Xperia, Nokia 8) calculated steps very accurately with MAPEs from 0.3–0.6%. Presset et al [ 42 ] analyzed step count accuracy of the Runtastic Pedometer smartphone application during treadmill walking for data collected at the hip. They reported MAPEs of 19.3% (2 km/h), 1.5% (4 km/h), and 0.7% (6 km/h).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ZTM algorithm using data from smartphones attached to the hip (Samsung Galaxy S10e, Sony Xperia, Nokia 8) calculated steps very accurately with MAPEs from 0.3–0.6%. Presset et al [ 42 ] analyzed step count accuracy of the Runtastic Pedometer smartphone application during treadmill walking for data collected at the hip. They reported MAPEs of 19.3% (2 km/h), 1.5% (4 km/h), and 0.7% (6 km/h).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practically, with the pedometer, we can get indirect information about the physical activity regime and the energy consumption achieved in the occupational context of the client (Hills et al, 2014). In fact, smartphone pedometers are now considered to be reliable tools for clinical research, being recommended for walking sessions even for low walking speed (Presset et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the mean absolute percentage of errors was small for iPhone SE and Samsung Galaxy for walking in natural conditions (<3%) compared with a wrist-worn ActiGraph (17%-47%) [41]. However, phone pedometers may underestimate steps [41] and are less accurate when placed further from the body [42]. In addition, as we examine steps over 24 hr, carry-over effects of previous messages may influence step changes.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 97%