2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.10.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of 18-F-FDG PET imaging in the follow up of endometrial cancer patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5Y7 For endometrial cancer, 18 F-FDG PET imaging has been used for staging and detection of recurrence with different results. 8,9 In the current study, we systematically searched the available literature on the accuracy of 18 F-FDG PET imaging for staging of endometrial cancer and presented the results in metaanalytic format.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5Y7 For endometrial cancer, 18 F-FDG PET imaging has been used for staging and detection of recurrence with different results. 8,9 In the current study, we systematically searched the available literature on the accuracy of 18 F-FDG PET imaging for staging of endometrial cancer and presented the results in metaanalytic format.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recently published meta-analysis estimated a treatment plan change rate of 22% to 35% by PET or PET/CT. 23 In this series, most of the treatment plans were based on the PET or PET/CT findings, which achieved a 5-year SAR of 56.6% in patients with extravaginal recurrences treated with surgery T RT T chemotherapy and a 5-year SAR of 83.3% in patients with isolated vaginal recurrence and received RT alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…35 A recent review and meta-analysis of the published literature showed that FDG-PET has a sensitivity of 95.8% (95%CI: 92.2%-98.1%), specificity of 92.5% (89.3%-94.9%), positive likelihood ratio of 9.53 (6.52-13.91), negative likelihood ratio of 0.075 (0.044-0.128), and diagnostic odds ratio of 204 (91.97-453.5) for detection of overall disease recurrence on patient-based analysis with better performance by PET/CT as compared with PET. 37 PET resulted in change of the treatment plan in 22%-35% of the patients. Although currently there are no studies using hybrid PET/MR scanners for evaluation of recurrent endometrial cancer, considering the advantages of this hybrid modality, it is expected that the combined PET/ MRI will be very useful in posttherapy evaluation of patients with endometrial cancer.…”
Section: Endometrial Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%