1988
DOI: 10.6028/jres.093.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy in trace analysis. II. Considerations of the measurement process. Quality assurance and reference materials for trace analysis

Abstract: Most analytical measurements are not absolute but depend on the correlation between physical phenomena and some intrinsic property, e.g., concentration. Therefore, calibration is an indispensable part of analytical chemistry. Unfortunately, calibrations are not free from interference by the environment. This disturbing environment can be the micro-environment, components in the sample that influence the calibration line. As a rule this interference is usually constant, though not always (e.g., separation proce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is hoped that the reader finds this useful since it is regarded as typical. Other papers in this volume will cover calibration [ 22 ], evolving factor analysis [ 23 ], and expert systems in analytical chemistry [ 24 ], all being subjects of intense study in European laboratories. More traditional fields, for example, cluster analysis and pattern recognition, although very actively pursued, have not been included in this abstract [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is hoped that the reader finds this useful since it is regarded as typical. Other papers in this volume will cover calibration [ 22 ], evolving factor analysis [ 23 ], and expert systems in analytical chemistry [ 24 ], all being subjects of intense study in European laboratories. More traditional fields, for example, cluster analysis and pattern recognition, although very actively pursued, have not been included in this abstract [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%