2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2010.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy evaluation for sub-aperture interferometry measurements of a synchrotron mirror using virtual experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is well demonstrated in different datasets for x direction, i.e. for different groups of datasets (11,12,13), (21,22,23) and (31, 32, 33), the errors are distributed (from left to right) in a increasing manner, first decreasing and then increasing manner, and decreasing manner, respectively. …”
Section: Simulation Verificationmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is well demonstrated in different datasets for x direction, i.e. for different groups of datasets (11,12,13), (21,22,23) and (31, 32, 33), the errors are distributed (from left to right) in a increasing manner, first decreasing and then increasing manner, and decreasing manner, respectively. …”
Section: Simulation Verificationmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Ye et al [10] used an optimal stitching planning method to measure large aspheric optical surface with ±4 mm range of probe and 20% of overlapped region. Wiegmann et al [11] evaluated the accuracy of the sub-aperture stitching method using virtual experiments and found that the overall accuracy of stitching result outperformed the direct measurement method by a factor of about 3. For surface measurement instruments such as coherence scanning interferometers, which are widely used today for precision surface measurement, some commercial products can provide a stitching function for relatively flat surfaces [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This task can typically be solved only by mathematical simulations of the complete measuring system. For this purpose, at PTB a simulation environment for optical surface metrology has been built, which is named SimOptDevice (Simulation for Optical Device) [11,12]. In a virtual experiment, a model of the measurement device is used and the measurement process is simulated (Fig.…”
Section: Interferometric Measurement Of Aspheresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computer model is implemented in MATLAB, which is a widespread tool for modeling and prototyping in the scientific community. It supports object-oriented programming approaches, which allow the modeling of a measuring system in a flexible way for various applications [23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Computer Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%