“…16 Pléiades twins (1A&1B) are being subjected for various type of research. Its post-launch geometric quality was handled by the researchers such as Bernard et al, 17 deLussy et al, 18 Delvit et al, 19 Greslou and deLussy, 13 Delvit et al, Michel et al, 20 de Franchis et al, 11 Perko et al, 21 Postelniak, 22 Poli et al, 23 Abduelmola, 24 Gim and Shin, 25 Henrico et al, 26 Dukuzemariya, 27 Kartal et al, 28 and Perko et al [29][30][31] Its height accuracy was also subjected by the studies of Durand et al, 32 Berthier et al, 33 Giraud et al, 34 Stumpf et al, 35 Eisank et al, 36 Jacobsen, 37 Nasir et al, 38 Noh and Howat, 39 Qayyum et al, 40 Ghuffar, 41 Ok et al, 42 Sadeq et al, 43 Sofia et al, 44 Mertes et al, 45 Peng et al, 46 Ok et al, 47 Piermattei et al, 48 and Loghin et al 49 Moreover, the author also managed three projects for handling the Pléiades 1A tri-stereo panchromatic and VNIR images with respect to the 2/3D georeferencing accuracy, image quality, generation and validation of Digital Surface Model (DSM)/Digital Terrain Model (DTM), generation of pan-sharpened image and its quality assessment. 50 When all accessible literature was reviewed, it was obvious that the 3D georeferencing accuracy of Pléiades 1A images and the DSM/DTM generation and validation were handled using RFM, and its private sensor-dependent orientation model was not carried out yet.…”