2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv.2012.01.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy assessments of land use change simulation based on Markov-cellular automata model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
49
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the predicted LULC map of 2015 was compared with the observed LULC map of 2015 using kappa index statistics (Kamusoko et al, 2009;Wang, Zheng, & Zang, 2012). The kappa index includes kappa for no information (K no ), kappa for grid cell level location (K location ) and kappa for stratum-level location (K locationStrata ) in addition to kappa standard (K standard ) which is equivalent to kappa (Cohen, 1960;Geri, Amici, & Rocchini, 2011;Pontius, 2000).…”
Section: Lulc Change Prediction and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the predicted LULC map of 2015 was compared with the observed LULC map of 2015 using kappa index statistics (Kamusoko et al, 2009;Wang, Zheng, & Zang, 2012). The kappa index includes kappa for no information (K no ), kappa for grid cell level location (K location ) and kappa for stratum-level location (K locationStrata ) in addition to kappa standard (K standard ) which is equivalent to kappa (Cohen, 1960;Geri, Amici, & Rocchini, 2011;Pontius, 2000).…”
Section: Lulc Change Prediction and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land-use and land-cover change (LUCC) modeling as a scientific field is rapidly advancing, as land use change is among the most important human influences on the environment. The cellular automata (CA)-Markov model is applicable to spatial land use simulations and land cover reconstructions [28], which could be capable of converting the quantitative results of the Markov chain into spatially explicit outcomes by means of a CA function [29]. This approach is also capable of simulating several land categories simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also observed that the reaction of the model is very good for 30 m to 120 m image resolution, which fits with Landsat TM, ETM remote sensing resolution and more time was spent to simulate the land use change (Wang et al, 2012) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%