2017
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-2-w7-1521-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy Assessment of Recent Global Ocean Tide Models Around Antarctica

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Due to the coverage limitation of T/P-series altimeters, the lack of bathymetric data under large ice shelves, and the inaccurate definitions of coastlines and grounding lines, the accuracy of ocean tide models around Antarctica is poorer than those in deep oceans. Using tidal measurements from tide gauges, gravimetric data and GPS records, the accuracy of seven state-of-the-art global ocean tide models (DTU10、EOT11a、GOT4.8、FES2012、FES2014、HAMTIDE12、TPXO8) is assessed, as well as the most widely-used … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observe large amplitudes along the northern coast of Australia (CSR, GFZ), the Hudson Bay (CSR, GFZ) as well as in the Filchner‐Ronne Ice Shelf along the Antarctic Peninsula (CSR, JPL, GFZ, see also Figure ). Global ocean tide models have limitations in these regions (Chen et al, ; Lei et al, ; Stammer et al, ), which speaks to the effectiveness of the tidal estimates, as these signatures are not present in ITSG‐Grace2018. We cannot identify any clear differences between the individual solutions on the continents, which leads us to the conclusion that the tidal estimates do not significantly absorb any hydrological signal.…”
Section: Evaluation and Intercomparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observe large amplitudes along the northern coast of Australia (CSR, GFZ), the Hudson Bay (CSR, GFZ) as well as in the Filchner‐Ronne Ice Shelf along the Antarctic Peninsula (CSR, JPL, GFZ, see also Figure ). Global ocean tide models have limitations in these regions (Chen et al, ; Lei et al, ; Stammer et al, ), which speaks to the effectiveness of the tidal estimates, as these signatures are not present in ITSG‐Grace2018. We cannot identify any clear differences between the individual solutions on the continents, which leads us to the conclusion that the tidal estimates do not significantly absorb any hydrological signal.…”
Section: Evaluation and Intercomparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a more detailed analysis of tides and tidal pressures near the grounding line is possible as shown by Begeman et al (2020). Also, investigations of sea ice dynamics and floating ice shelves are expected to improve tidal errors (Sun et al, 2022;Lei et al, 2017). We would like to conduct more detailed investigations of these factors in a future effort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a more detailed analysis of tides and tidal pressures near the grounding line is possible as shown by Begeman et al (2020). Also, investigations of sea ice dynamics and floating ice shelves are expected to improve tidal errors (Sun et al, 2022;Lei et al, 2017). We would like to conduct more detailed investigations of these factors in a future effort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%