2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-015-4847-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy assessment of land cover/land use classifiers in dry and humid areas of Iran

Abstract: Land cover/land use (LCLU) maps are essential inputs for environmental analysis. Remote sensing provides an opportunity to construct LCLU maps of large geographic areas in a timely fashion. Knowing the most accurate classification method to produce LCLU maps based on site characteristics is necessary for the environment managers. The aim of this research is to examine the performance of various classification algorithms for LCLU mapping in dry and humid climates (from June to August). Testing is performed in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main advantage for land cover mapping is the production of more accurate classification. (46)(47)(48) In our study also, the performance is better. MahD, which is a direction-sensitive distance classifier that uses statistics for each class and assumes that all class covariances are equal and therefore is a faster method, has also shown better performance and improvement.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The main advantage for land cover mapping is the production of more accurate classification. (46)(47)(48) In our study also, the performance is better. MahD, which is a direction-sensitive distance classifier that uses statistics for each class and assumes that all class covariances are equal and therefore is a faster method, has also shown better performance and improvement.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The extracted training samples were divided randomly to 70% and 30% datasets, which were utilized for modeling and validation of LULC maps, respectively. Subsequently, a Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm was implemented for LULC mapping in the reference years [27]. Finally, Kappa coefficient and overall accuracy were computed and employed to assess the LULC maps through a comparison of produced LULC maps and real ground data [24,[27][28][29].…”
Section: Lulc Mapping and Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total error of corrections was estimated according to root mean standard error (RMSE), and gives 1.78 m in pixel (Giriraj et al, 2008;Yousefi et al, 2015b). Using true composite images in Landsat data (Red, Green, and Blue bands) and normalized difference water index (NDWI), the active channel for study periods by ENVI 4.8 was extracted (Haibo et al, 2011;Ko et al, 2015;Yousefi et al, 2015a). Based on 2016 Landsat OLI image, the study reach was divided into 48 meander loops.…”
Section: Data Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%