Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management 2019
DOI: 10.5220/0007710800770087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy Assessment of a Photogrammetric UAV Block by using Different Software and Adopting Diverse Processing Strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This command allowed to calibrate the images and to align them in a local reference system according to several parameters. According to the previous tests reported in [48], in order to improve the achieved results after the bundle block adjustment, a more complex calibration model was used. The employed calibration model was the one reported in [49], hereafter called F15P7.…”
Section: Micmacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This command allowed to calibrate the images and to align them in a local reference system according to several parameters. According to the previous tests reported in [48], in order to improve the achieved results after the bundle block adjustment, a more complex calibration model was used. The employed calibration model was the one reported in [49], hereafter called F15P7.…”
Section: Micmacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only the four multispectral channels were considered, having 6.8 cm GSD; higher resolution RGB imagery was disregarded, as it is recorded in the JPEG format with a high compression factor, and has low quality compared to photogrammetry requirements. The processing followed the usual pipeline [35,36]: image alignment, tie point extraction, manual measurement of GCPs and CPs, bundle block adjustment (BBA), generation of dense point clouds, digital surface modeling (DSM), and creation of orthomosaic and reflectance maps. The software allows only one set of calibration target images to be used per project, so the photogrammetric processing followed a single-block approach.…”
Section: The Photogrammetric Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On that basis, 3D scene accuracy is improved to a greater extent, and operational risks and the dependence on GCPs are reduced [27]. Most existing studies for 3D scene accuracy are based on combining different data processing software and different GCPs layout schemes to accurately assess a single image dataset by using checkpoints [28,29]. However, when RTK UAVs are adopted to analyze the geomorphological evolution of long time series, the accuracy of the 3D scenes of repeated observations may change significantly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%