2018 IEEE 14th International Colloquium on Signal Processing &Amp; Its Applications (CSPA) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/cspa.2018.8368723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy assessment of 3-dimensional LiDAR building extraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That study determined that QL2 data is limited to extracting buildings and trees in the streetscape. Since other studies linking LiDAR building classifications with building footprints show strong correlations (32,33), and since street trees are a significantly analyzed topic in transportation research, the study examined and found significant statistical differences between deriving 3D characteristics of trees against 2D LiDAR-derived polygons. QL2 data is limited in relation to usefulness for transportation-based feature extraction, however, as many more critical features other than building and trees exist in a typical streetscape environment.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…That study determined that QL2 data is limited to extracting buildings and trees in the streetscape. Since other studies linking LiDAR building classifications with building footprints show strong correlations (32,33), and since street trees are a significantly analyzed topic in transportation research, the study examined and found significant statistical differences between deriving 3D characteristics of trees against 2D LiDAR-derived polygons. QL2 data is limited in relation to usefulness for transportation-based feature extraction, however, as many more critical features other than building and trees exist in a typical streetscape environment.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Today, different approaches and models of accuracy assessment of 3D building can be found [64][65][66]. The first group of approaches consists in comparing the created building model to the reference model, which is presented in the same form [67,68].…”
Section: Data Accuracy Assementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other streetscape features such as signs, landmarks, power poles, and overhanging lights (to name a few) would initially have an automated LiDAR classification of ''Unclassified'' or ''Other'' and require manual classification. Studies linking LiDAR building classifications with actual building footprints show that the LiDAR processing community has made significant inroads with producing highly accurate building footprints from LiDAR (22,23).…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%