1994
DOI: 10.1016/0924-2716(94)90011-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy assessment in cotton acreage estimation using Indian remote sensing satellite data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Multi-temporal analysis techniques have been applied as well to coarser resolution data such as NOAA-AVHRR [18] and NASA-MODIS data [1,19], taking advantage of high revisit time for these sensors [20]. Other satellite data too, with spectral and spatial features similar to Landsat, have been used for crop mapping achieving satisfactory results, e.g., IRS LISS data [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-temporal analysis techniques have been applied as well to coarser resolution data such as NOAA-AVHRR [18] and NASA-MODIS data [1,19], taking advantage of high revisit time for these sensors [20]. Other satellite data too, with spectral and spatial features similar to Landsat, have been used for crop mapping achieving satisfactory results, e.g., IRS LISS data [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Area inventory deviations of less than 2 per cent were obtained by Dutta et al (1994) and decreasing accuracy with lower crop proportion was shown by Chakraborty et al (1995). However, both these studies were undertaken for sites characterized by single dominant crop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Independent accuracy evaluation can be done by comparing the classified image with wall-to-wall ground truth information as has been done by Dutta et al (1994) for cotton crop in Hissar, Haryana and Chakraborty et al (1995) for rice crop in Orissa. Area inventory deviations of less than 2 per cent were obtained by Dutta et al (1994) and decreasing accuracy with lower crop proportion was shown by Chakraborty et al (1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Localised catastrophes could be verified, and variance-covariance analyzed components. In prior investigations, NDVI has a moderate-to-high accuracy in forecasting crop production [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], but boundary areas (transition from drought to normal conditions) have not been analyzed. In the present study, the NDVI is stable in the transition zone, and strong enough to detect statistically significant differences in plant growth (irrigated vs. non-irrigated), even early in the plant growth cycle (Figure 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%