Accuracy and Trending Ability of Cardiac Index Measured by the CNAP System in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surgery

Miyazaki, Erika; Maeda, Takuma; Ito, Shinya; Oi, Ayako; Hotta, Naoshi; Tsukinaga, Akito; Kanazawa, Hiroko; Ohnishi, Yoshihiko

doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2020.08.012

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The measurements by CNAP in comparison with those obtained invasively using transpulmonary thermodilution (PiCCO) showed a percentage error of 25%, recognized as an acceptable agreement between the investigated techniques. In another study, CNAP-derived cardiac index measurements were recognized as noninterchangeable with those obtained using 3-dimensional images [ 30 ]. However, the high systemic vascular resistance index in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery may partially account for the observed inaccuracies.…”

Section: Assessing Precision and Accuracymentioning

confidence: 99%

Non-Invasive Continuous Measurement of Haemodynamic Parameters—Clinical Utility

Bodys-Pełka

Kusztal

Boszko

et al. 2021

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The evaluation and monitoring of patients’ haemodynamic parameters are essential in everyday clinical practice. The application of continuous, non-invasive measurement methods is a relatively recent solution. CNAP, ClearSight and many other technologies have been introduced to the market. The use of these techniques for assessing patient eligibility before cardiac procedures, as well as for intraoperative monitoring is currently being widely investigated. Their numerous advantages, including the simplicity of application, time- and cost-effectiveness, and the limited risk of infection, could enforce their further development and potential utility. However, some limitations and contradictions should also be discussed. The aim of this paper is to briefly describe the new findings, give practical examples of the clinical utility of these methods, compare them with invasive techniques, and review the literature on this subject.

show abstract

Section: Assessing Precision and Accuracymentioning

confidence: 99%