1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)45086-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy and Repeatability of Bladder Volume Measurement Using Ultrasonic Imaging

Abstract: We assessed 6 methods for calculating bladder volume from ultrasonic cross-sectional scans. The technique that used the largest number of features from the scans gave the best results. For volumes greater than 150 ml. an accuracy of 0.87 and repeatability of +/- 9 per cent (standard deviation) were obtained.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
71
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
71
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-invasive objective parameters such as free-flow rate (15), residual (16) and prostate volume (17) were not accurate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-invasive objective parameters such as free-flow rate (15), residual (16) and prostate volume (17) were not accurate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 On the other hand, urethral catheterization has been accepted as the standard for PVR measurement. 5,6 Although some studies suggest poor correlation between the bladder volumes predicted by ultrasonography and those obtained by urethral catheterization, ultrasonography is a reliable, noninvasive, inexpensive, and simple method that has been used extensively for this purpose. [6][7][8][9][10] In clinical practice, patients whose PVR will be measured are advised to drink a considerable amount of fluid before the examination and to urinate when they experience a moderate to severe desire to void.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximum length (L) width (W) and depth (D) were measured on both sides for calculating kidney volume. The kidney volume was calculated using the ellipsoid volume formula as L×W×D×0.523 (4,5). Anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the renal pelvis and parenchymal thickness were also measured.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%