2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy and repeatability of a new method for measuring facet loads in the lumbar spine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
83
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is mostly due to technical difficulties and limited repeatability of the measurements. Data obtained with extra-articular strain gauges are highly sensitive to the number and the positioning of the strain gauges [35]. The use of intra-articular sensors or pressuresensitive films is inherently limited by the need of disrupting the facet capsule and the presence of a foreign body inside the articulation that alters the actual pressure distribution [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is mostly due to technical difficulties and limited repeatability of the measurements. Data obtained with extra-articular strain gauges are highly sensitive to the number and the positioning of the strain gauges [35]. The use of intra-articular sensors or pressuresensitive films is inherently limited by the need of disrupting the facet capsule and the presence of a foreign body inside the articulation that alters the actual pressure distribution [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data obtained with extra-articular strain gauges are highly sensitive to the number and the positioning of the strain gauges [35]. The use of intra-articular sensors or pressuresensitive films is inherently limited by the need of disrupting the facet capsule and the presence of a foreign body inside the articulation that alters the actual pressure distribution [35]. Our calculations yielded facet forces between 30 and 40 N in extension, which are consistent with in vitro data of Wilson et al [35] who found a range of 10-50 N for the same moment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a recent study using the same technique as Buttermann et al (1991) [131], with strain gauges mounted on the lamina of an isolated cadaveric lumbar vertebra, showed that considerable error can stem from determining facet force from extra-articular strains in all loading configurations except axial rotation [133]. Nevertheless, this strain gauge technique for the evaluation of the facet force preserves the facet capsule and enables comparison of load transfer through the facet joint before and after implantation of a medical device such as a fusion cage or an artificial disc Thin and flat pressure-sensitive paper or sensors can also be inserted between the articular surfaces of the joint after capsule transection to measure facet force [134][135][136] and contact pressure [137][138][139]. Using pressure-sensitive paper Dunlop [137] was one of the first to localize the regions and maximal magnitudes of contact pressure that are established in the human cadaveric lumbar facet joint during combined loading, with sagittal bending coupled with a 1000 N compressive load and a 200-400 N shear load applied to motion segments.…”
Section: Facet Forces and Pressuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5b) also depending on the BW. Most of these computed values laid within the ranges of 10-50 N and 55-110 N measured under 7.5 Nm extension and axial rotation, respectively [46]. For most applied loads the presence of the device affected the FJ biomechanics at both the treated and adjacent levels.…”
Section: Intersegmental Rotationsmentioning
confidence: 73%