1995
DOI: 10.1161/01.str.26.10.1747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy and Prognostic Consequences of Ultrasonography in Identifying Severe Carotid Artery Stenosis

Abstract: The results indicate that the accuracy of ultrasonography is moderate when flow parameters are used to assess the degree of stenosis. Ultrasonography should be used as a screening tool to exclude patients with no carotid artery disease from further testing. Conventional angiography remains an essential investigation before assigning the risk of stroke and deciding appropriate treatment for extracranial carotid artery disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
88
1
7

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
88
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The stroke registrar and nurse triage referrals on a daily basis, with priority appointments for patients with ipsilateral internal carotid artery stenosis ≥50%, a conservative threshold chosen to avoid missing a critical stenosis attributable to ultrasound misclassification. 18 For patients with ≥50% ipsilateral internal carotid artery stenosis, confirmatory computed tomography angiography or contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography is arranged within 24 hours. Immediate referral for surgical intervention occurs for patients with confirmed symptomatic stenosis ≥70%.…”
Section: M3t Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stroke registrar and nurse triage referrals on a daily basis, with priority appointments for patients with ipsilateral internal carotid artery stenosis ≥50%, a conservative threshold chosen to avoid missing a critical stenosis attributable to ultrasound misclassification. 18 For patients with ≥50% ipsilateral internal carotid artery stenosis, confirmatory computed tomography angiography or contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography is arranged within 24 hours. Immediate referral for surgical intervention occurs for patients with confirmed symptomatic stenosis ≥70%.…”
Section: M3t Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, conventional angiography is also associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events. 19 Consequently, noninvasive techniques, such as ultrasound (US) echo color Doppler (US-ECD), 20,21 MR, 22,23 and CT angiography (CTA) 18,24 have been more and more frequently used to study carotid artery pathology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14][15][16][17][18] However, in a nonselected population of 1011 symptomatic patients from the NASCET, sensitivity and specificity for detecting 70 to 99% carotid stenosis were only 0.68 and 0.67, respectively, and even more important, PSV values did not correlate with the risk of stroke. 19 This indicates that patient selection cannot be performed on PSV values alone. Therefore, if ultrasonography is used for patient selection, additional means for quantifying lumen reduction seem required.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%