2017
DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20170058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy and predictive value of incarcerated adults' accounts of their self-harm histories: findings froman Australian prospective data linkage study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(43 reference statements)
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differing levels of support from non-government organisations (NGOs) and service providers on Nauru and Manus Island, as well as the timing of the roll-out and use of the new centralised data base for recording incidents (known as the Planning and Operational Management System (POMS)) during this period, may have also contributed to inconsistent reporting and recording of incidents for these populations (ANAO, 2017). Furthermore, recent research has highlighted the methodological limitations of using only one data source to identify self-harm, including among incarcerated adults (Borschmann et al, 2011, 2017). The self-harm figures for the Australian asylum seeker population recorded here, based on the incidents reported to the DIBP in the 12 months to 31st July 2015, are likely to reflect an under-ascertainment of the true number of incidents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differing levels of support from non-government organisations (NGOs) and service providers on Nauru and Manus Island, as well as the timing of the roll-out and use of the new centralised data base for recording incidents (known as the Planning and Operational Management System (POMS)) during this period, may have also contributed to inconsistent reporting and recording of incidents for these populations (ANAO, 2017). Furthermore, recent research has highlighted the methodological limitations of using only one data source to identify self-harm, including among incarcerated adults (Borschmann et al, 2011, 2017). The self-harm figures for the Australian asylum seeker population recorded here, based on the incidents reported to the DIBP in the 12 months to 31st July 2015, are likely to reflect an under-ascertainment of the true number of incidents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that most people who self-harm do not seek help (Rowe et al 2014), incarceration is a unique opportunity to identify self-harm history and initiate appropriate mental health treatment. Self-reported self-harm lacks sensitivity, however identification of people at risk of self-harm can be improved through combining multiple data sources, including community health records (Borschmann et al 2017). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we used convenience sampling, thus the prevalence reported here cannot be considered representative of the prevalence in the wider Australian prison population. Second, as self-harm is typically under-reported in the prison environment (Borschmann et al 2017), it is likely that we under-estimated the lifetime prevalence of self-harm. Disclosure of self-harm can be highly stigmatising (Mackay and Barrowclough 2005) and may result in increased correctional monitoring and restrictive interventions (Justice Health 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retaining people released from prison in survey-based longitudinal studies is notoriously challenging ( 72 ), but a methodology that holds promise is data linkage. Administrative data can be a valuable complement to self-reported data in both routine data collection and research, particularly when examining proscribed or stigmatized behaviors ( 14 , 32 , 35 , 72 ). Linkage with administrative health data also provides opportunities to accurately document the considerable costs of health care for people released from prison ( 73 ), which may assist in health economic analyses and in advocating for investments in primary and preventive health care for this population ( 74 ).…”
Section: Recurring Themes Evidence Gaps and A Way Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%