Abstract:BackgroundBlood pressure is relevant to the diagnosis and management of many medical, cardiovascular and critical diseases. The accuracy of many commonly used noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) monitors and the accuracy of NIBP measurements in hypo‐ and hypertensive standing horses has not been determined.Hypothesis/ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy of an oscillometric BP monitor in standing horses before and during pharmacologically induced hyper‐ and hypotension and to comp… Show more
“…This is comparable to results of an early study where another monitor was evaluated in a similar study setting in horses (Branson 1997). The more recent studies using different oscillometric devices similarly showed an underestimation of MAP, SAP and DAP (Tünsmeyer et al 2015, Drynan et al 2016, Heliczer et al 2016, Olsen et al 2016). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…have been evaluated revealing various results concerning the reliability of the different methods in different species (Riebold andEvans 1985, Bailey et al 1994). Oscillometric blood pressure measurement is commonly used in human and small animal medicine and several non invasive blood pressure monitors have been evaluated in standing or anaesthetised horses recently (Hatz et al 2015, Tünsmeyer et al 2015, Drynan et al 2016, Heliczer et al 2016, Olsen et al 2016 In the present study, overall the non-invasive blood pressure measurement underestimated MAP, SAP and DAP compared to the invasive measurement. In the medical field, European recommendations define 5 mmHg as very accurate, 6 -10 mmHg as slightly inaccurate, 11-15 mmHg as modera- tely inaccurate and >15 mmHg as very inaccurate (O'Brien et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Accuracy (bias) in the other oscillometric devices evaluated recently in anaesthetised horses ranged from 0.5 -2 mmHg for MAP, while precision (SD of the difference) ranged from 10 -14 mmHg (Tünsmeyer et al 2015, Drynan et al 2016, Heliczer et al 2016). The two most common clinical settings where arterial blood pressure is measured are anaesthetised horses and standing, conscious horses with suspicion of hypertension.…”
Summary: The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of indirect blood pressure measurements with an oscillometric blood pressure monitor (S/5, Datex-Ohmeda) in anaesthetized horses. The study was conducted as a prospective experimental study. Seven adult horses, five geldings and two mares, were used in this study. The average age was 15 ± 8 years (mean ± SD) and the horses were weighing between 485 and 654 kg. Invasive and non-invasive blood pressure measurements were recorded simultaneously and a total of 263 values were analyzed. The number of measurements obtained in each horse depended on the anaesthesia time (104 -225 minutes). Bland and Altman analysis for repeated measurements was used for assessment of the data. Overall the most accurate measurement was achieved with mean arterial pressure (MAP) measurement with a bias of 5 mmHg compared to a bias of 7 mmHg in the systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and of 9 mmHg in the diastolic arterial pressure (DAP). The MAP proved to be the most precise in the low arterial blood pressure group (3 mmHg) followed by the medium arterial blood pressure group (5mmHg). These results show that non-invasive blood pressure measurements with Datex Ohmeda (S/5, Datex-Ohmeda, S/5™ Collect, Datex-Ohmeda) monitoring can be an adequate alternative to measure blood pressure in anaesthetized horses when invasive blood pressure measurement cannot be performed. Besides monitoring of anaesthesia, non-invasive blood pressure measurement can be very helpful in alert horses due to its non-stressful and non-invasive nature. Further comparable projects are required in awake patients and data collected in this study could serve as a basis for that.Keywords: horse, anaesthesia, blood pressure measurement, oscillometric blood pressure monitor, Datex Ohmeda Citation: Fouché N., Auer U., Iff I. (2016) Comparison of non-invasive and invasive blood pressure measurements in horses during anaesthesia using the oscillometric blood pressure monitor S/5 Datex Ohmeda. Pferdeheilkunde 32,[479][480][481][482][483][484]
“…This is comparable to results of an early study where another monitor was evaluated in a similar study setting in horses (Branson 1997). The more recent studies using different oscillometric devices similarly showed an underestimation of MAP, SAP and DAP (Tünsmeyer et al 2015, Drynan et al 2016, Heliczer et al 2016, Olsen et al 2016). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…have been evaluated revealing various results concerning the reliability of the different methods in different species (Riebold andEvans 1985, Bailey et al 1994). Oscillometric blood pressure measurement is commonly used in human and small animal medicine and several non invasive blood pressure monitors have been evaluated in standing or anaesthetised horses recently (Hatz et al 2015, Tünsmeyer et al 2015, Drynan et al 2016, Heliczer et al 2016, Olsen et al 2016 In the present study, overall the non-invasive blood pressure measurement underestimated MAP, SAP and DAP compared to the invasive measurement. In the medical field, European recommendations define 5 mmHg as very accurate, 6 -10 mmHg as slightly inaccurate, 11-15 mmHg as modera- tely inaccurate and >15 mmHg as very inaccurate (O'Brien et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Accuracy (bias) in the other oscillometric devices evaluated recently in anaesthetised horses ranged from 0.5 -2 mmHg for MAP, while precision (SD of the difference) ranged from 10 -14 mmHg (Tünsmeyer et al 2015, Drynan et al 2016, Heliczer et al 2016). The two most common clinical settings where arterial blood pressure is measured are anaesthetised horses and standing, conscious horses with suspicion of hypertension.…”
Summary: The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of indirect blood pressure measurements with an oscillometric blood pressure monitor (S/5, Datex-Ohmeda) in anaesthetized horses. The study was conducted as a prospective experimental study. Seven adult horses, five geldings and two mares, were used in this study. The average age was 15 ± 8 years (mean ± SD) and the horses were weighing between 485 and 654 kg. Invasive and non-invasive blood pressure measurements were recorded simultaneously and a total of 263 values were analyzed. The number of measurements obtained in each horse depended on the anaesthesia time (104 -225 minutes). Bland and Altman analysis for repeated measurements was used for assessment of the data. Overall the most accurate measurement was achieved with mean arterial pressure (MAP) measurement with a bias of 5 mmHg compared to a bias of 7 mmHg in the systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and of 9 mmHg in the diastolic arterial pressure (DAP). The MAP proved to be the most precise in the low arterial blood pressure group (3 mmHg) followed by the medium arterial blood pressure group (5mmHg). These results show that non-invasive blood pressure measurements with Datex Ohmeda (S/5, Datex-Ohmeda, S/5™ Collect, Datex-Ohmeda) monitoring can be an adequate alternative to measure blood pressure in anaesthetized horses when invasive blood pressure measurement cannot be performed. Besides monitoring of anaesthesia, non-invasive blood pressure measurement can be very helpful in alert horses due to its non-stressful and non-invasive nature. Further comparable projects are required in awake patients and data collected in this study could serve as a basis for that.Keywords: horse, anaesthesia, blood pressure measurement, oscillometric blood pressure monitor, Datex Ohmeda Citation: Fouché N., Auer U., Iff I. (2016) Comparison of non-invasive and invasive blood pressure measurements in horses during anaesthesia using the oscillometric blood pressure monitor S/5 Datex Ohmeda. Pferdeheilkunde 32,[479][480][481][482][483][484]
“…The mean SAP, DAP, MAP, and HR recorded for the MR and control groups in our study were similar to the reference values reported in the veterinary medical literature using an ultrasonic blood flow detector technique and an oscillometric method . Although PP of healthy horses is only specifically reported in a single paper, reference values for PP can be deduced from other reported SAP and DAP values obtained in healthy horses and were similar to those found in our control horses . Correction for tail height above heart base is necessary to evaluate the accuracy of NIBP measurements of SAP, DAP, and MAP among different sized horses but is redundant when assessing changes in PP, because both SAP and DAP will change by the same magnitude in a given horse.…”
Background
Noninvasive blood pressures (NIBP) and pulse pressures (PP) have not been published in horses with aortic and mitral regurgitation (AR or MR).
Objectives
To investigate NIBP and PP in healthy Warmblood horses and horses with AR and MR and propose PP cutoffs to identify and stage AR severity.
Animals
Seventy‐three Warmblood horses (healthy, 10; AR, 31; MR, 32).
Methods
Retrospective study. All horses had NIBP and an echocardiogram recorded. Cases were categorized based on severity of regurgitation. Pulse pressures were compared among healthy, MR, and AR groups and among AR severity groups. Cutoffs were determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analyses.
Results
Horses with AR had higher PP than horses with MR (mean difference [95% confidence interval (CI)], +17 [9‐26] mm Hg,
P
< .001) and controls (+17 [5‐30] mm Hg;
P
=.004). Horses with severe AR had higher PP compared those with mild (+38 [20‐54] mm Hg;
P
< 0.001) and moderate AR (+33 [18‐47] mm Hg;
P
< .001). The PP cutoffs to distinguish AR from MR and controls were 38 mm Hg (sensitivity [Sn], 100%; specificity [Sp], 19%) for maximal Sn and 61 mm Hg (Sn, 43%; Sp, 100%) for maximal Sp. The PP cutoffs to distinguish severe AR from mild and moderate AR were 57 mm Hg (Sn, 100%; Sp, 70%) for maximal Sn and 77 mm Hg (Sn, 75%; Sp, 100%) for maximal Sp.
Conclusions and Clinical Importance
Horses with AR have increased PP. Noninvasive PP measurements interpreted with provided cutoffs may aid clinicians in diagnosing and staging severity of AR in horses.
“…Blood samples were collected at 8 am daily for determination of packed cell volume (PCV), total protein (TP) concentration, and serum biochemical profiles. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was measured with a tail cuff using an oscillometric monitor device (SurgiVet Advisor [Smiths Medical, Norwell, Massachusetts]) as previously described . Mean arterial pressure was measured daily at T = 0 (before drug administration), and 1, 5, and 9 hours after drug administration.…”
BackgroundDiuretic treatment is the mainstay for management of congestive heart failure in horses, and its use has been restricted to injectable medications because no currently data supports the use of PO administered loop diuretics.ObjectivesTo determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of PO administered torsemide and, determine if PO administered torsemide, could be used as an alternative to injectable diuretics in the horse.AnimalsSix healthy adult mares.MethodsA 2‐phase, prospective study, that consisted of pharmacokinetic profiling of a single dose (6 mg/kg PO) and pharmacodynamic effects of long‐term torsemide administration (2 mg/kg PO q12h) for 6 days in healthy horses.ResultsPharmacokinetic analysis identified a peak concentration (C
max) of 10.14 µg/mL (range, 6.79–14.69 µg/mL) and elimination half‐life (T
1/2) 9.2 hours (range, 8.4–10.4 hours). The area under the plasma drug concentration over time curve (AUC) was 80.7 µg × h/mL (range, 56.5–117.2 µg × h/mL). A statistically significant increase in urine volume and decrease in urine specific gravity were found from day 0 (baseline) to day 6 (P < .0001). Significant alterations in biochemical variables included hyponatremia, hypokalemia, hypochloremia, and increased serum creatinine concentration. Mean arterial blood pressure significantly decreased on day 6 (57.7 ± 8.8 mm Hg, P = .001) as compared with baseline (78 ± 6.1 mm Hg). Serum aldosterone concentrations significantly increased after 6 days of torsemide administration (P = .0006).Conclusions and Clinical ImportancePO administered torsemide (4 mg/kg/day) successfully reached therapeutic concentrations in blood, induced clinically relevant diuresis, and resulted in moderate pre‐renal azotemia and electrolyte disturbances.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.