2009
DOI: 10.1084/jem2067oia15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy and precision in quantitative fluorescence microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
154
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(125 reference statements)
1
154
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It allows for stable and strong fluorescence necessary to get SIM images of the appropriate quality with a high signal-to-noise ratio. In this approach, the top quality of the images is a must and, therefore, a careful control of all the steps necessary to gain the best quality images is a necessary prerequisite (Waters, 2009). Importantly, our method can reliably detect voids in DAPI staining as well as a drop in lamin B around NPCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It allows for stable and strong fluorescence necessary to get SIM images of the appropriate quality with a high signal-to-noise ratio. In this approach, the top quality of the images is a must and, therefore, a careful control of all the steps necessary to gain the best quality images is a necessary prerequisite (Waters, 2009). Importantly, our method can reliably detect voids in DAPI staining as well as a drop in lamin B around NPCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Identical settings were used and images were taken within several days for each set of samples. A histogram of gray values was used to calculate relative GFP signal levels following methods for quantitative fluorescence microscopy (Waters 2009). The background signal for each image was determined using a region that did not contain worms and its average gray value per pixel and associated standard deviation were calculated using the Zeiss software.…”
Section: Construction Of Reportermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the edge measurements we used the maximum value obtained. To get an accurate assessment of the change in immunostaining level in mutants it is essential to correct for nonspecific staining (Waters 2009). To do this we did similar measurements on clones of mwh 1 , a null allele.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%