2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2010.00758.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy and perceptions of virtual microscopy compared with glass slide microscopy in cervical cytology

Abstract: Diagnostic accuracy of virtual microscopy can equal that of glass slide microscopy. However, without good computer network connections, wide focal range and software that permits effortless navigation across virtual slides, cytologists are unlikely to be convinced of the utility of this technology for cytology screening and diagnosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
107
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
107
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A stack of 41 images (20 above and below the BSFP) were acquired at interval of 1µm for every non-empty FOV. The 41µm sampled depth range range was believed to be larger than the reported thickness of the specimens (15-20µm) [8]. To exclude any outlier FOVs, the segmentation results and depths maps were manually examined for quality, especially where the specimen was thick.…”
Section: Specimen Preparation and Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A stack of 41 images (20 above and below the BSFP) were acquired at interval of 1µm for every non-empty FOV. The 41µm sampled depth range range was believed to be larger than the reported thickness of the specimens (15-20µm) [8]. To exclude any outlier FOVs, the segmentation results and depths maps were manually examined for quality, especially where the specimen was thick.…”
Section: Specimen Preparation and Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, important diagnostic cells are often found within these cell clumps, such as secretory cells from the endocervic and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [15]. Therefore, it is no surprise to see that the acquisition of multiple focal planes achieves better diagnostic performances than acquiring only one or a few focal planes [26,8]. Additionally, interpreting cellular objects requires the microscope to operate at high magnification (40x), preferably at resolutions close to the diffraction limit (∼0.2µm/pixel), where the depth-of-field is reduced to around one micron [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is generally believed that the thickness of the LBC based cervical cytology specimens used for cervical cytology screening is around 20 microns, so around 20 focal planes are acquired in some studies (Bradley and Bamford 2004;Evered and Dudding 2011). Although some studies had argued that fewer number of focal planes could be sufficient for diagnosis, the exact number of focal planes required is generally decided empirically.…”
Section: Specimen Localisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, important diagnostic cells are often found within these cell clumps, such as secretory cells from the endocervic and low-grade squamous intraep-ithelial lesions (Lee et al 2011). Therefore, it is no surprise to see that the acquisition of multiple focal planes achieves better diagnostic performances than acquiring only one or a few focal planes (Evered and Dudding 2011;Wright et al 2013). Additionally, interpreting cellular objects requires the microscope to operate at high magnification (40×), preferably at resolutions close to the diffraction limit (∼0.2µm/pixel), where the DOF is reduced to around one micron (Castleman 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%