1983
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1983.57.3.683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy and Latency of Judgment of Facial Expressions of Emotions

Abstract: The aim of the experiment was to study the relation between accuracy of judgment of facial expressions of emotions and time for judgment. The results for 34 college students confirmed previous data showing high performance in identification of all emotions, although there were some important differences between emotions. Also, times for judgment were longer for the emotions which were more difficult to identify.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
68
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
17
68
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, disgusted, neutral, and sad middle-aged faces were less accurately identified than young faces displaying those expressions. Also consistent with earlier studies (Kirouac & Dore, 1983;Ruffman et al, 2008), contrast analyses collapsed across young, middle-aged, and older raters showed that identification of happiness was easier than identification of all the other expressions and that identification of disgust was more difficult than identification of all the other expressions in young, middle-aged, and older faces (all ps .05; see Figure 4). …”
Section: Expression Identification As a Function Of Age And Expressiosupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Furthermore, disgusted, neutral, and sad middle-aged faces were less accurately identified than young faces displaying those expressions. Also consistent with earlier studies (Kirouac & Dore, 1983;Ruffman et al, 2008), contrast analyses collapsed across young, middle-aged, and older raters showed that identification of happiness was easier than identification of all the other expressions and that identification of disgust was more difficult than identification of all the other expressions in young, middle-aged, and older faces (all ps .05; see Figure 4). …”
Section: Expression Identification As a Function Of Age And Expressiosupporting
confidence: 77%
“…However, if anything, participants took longer to identify negative faces than positive ones. This finding is consistent with the general observation that positive facial expressions are identified more quickly and accurately than negative facial expressions when faces are presented within focal attention (Kirouac & Doré, 1983, 1984Mandal & Palchoudhury, 1985;McAndrew, 1986;Stalans & Wedding, 1985). The results are also inconsistent with the other postattentive explanation, which argues that negative faces are found more efficiently than positive faces under full viewing conditions, because observers are more likely to miss the positive rather than the negative target faces.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…In contrast, fear and anger obtained the lowest number of correct responses and the longest reaction times. Our findings thus coincide with those from previous studies that observed greater accuracy in detecting happiness than expressions of fear (Juth, Lundqvist, Karlsson, & Ohman, 2005;Kirouac & Dore, 1983), anger (Becker, Anderson, Mortensen, Neufeld, & Neel, 2011;Becker et al, 2012;Juth et al, 2005), and sadness (Srivastava & Srinivasan, 2010). These findings have led researchers to postulate that happy facial expressions are more visually-discriminable, probably because their communicative intent is less ambiguous than that of other expressions (Becker et al, 2011).…”
Section: Emotional Recognitionsupporting
confidence: 81%