2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2008.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy and interobserver reliability of three-dimensional rotational angiography versus mathematical models for volumetric measurement of intracranial aneurysms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aneurysm volumes were calculated using the equation for an ellipse (shown below), where W (mm) was the measured width and H (mm) was the measured height. 13 …”
Section: Surgical Aneurysm Creationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aneurysm volumes were calculated using the equation for an ellipse (shown below), where W (mm) was the measured width and H (mm) was the measured height. 13 …”
Section: Surgical Aneurysm Creationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radiological characterization of intracranial aneurysms (IA) is subject to rater-dependent differences [8,9,14,15]. Interobserver variability is more pronounced in the description of IA morphology than in the measurement of IA size [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interobserver variability is more pronounced in the description of IA morphology than in the measurement of IA size [9]. A relevant limitation of the current scientific evidence on this topic is that it was derived almost exclusively from small-(<7 mm) and medium (7-13 mm)-sized IA while data on large (14-24 mm) and giant intracranial aneurysms (≥25 mm, GIA) were basically left out [8,9,14,15]. This is worth mentioning since the risk of IA rupture increases with IA size [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%