The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2019.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy and effectiveness of orthophotos obtained from low cost UASs video imagery for traffic accident scenes documentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The longer battery life, the ability to plan automatic flights with easy-to-use ground station software, and their small size are real advantages, and the structure from motion algorithms (SFM) allow accurate digital elevation models (DEM) and ortho-mosaic terrain models over large areas. Today UAVs are increasingly accessible and have widespread applications, such as in environmental monitoring systems for agroforestry, structural geology, archaeology, marine habitats, supervised hazards, and accidents [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39], and recently also in monitoring ML on the coast [40][41][42][43][44] or that floating in rivers [45]. These studies are not uniform with regard to the data processing procedures, ranging from visual interpretation of images [42] and analysis of the spectral profile of litter [46], to the use of machine learning methods [43,44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The longer battery life, the ability to plan automatic flights with easy-to-use ground station software, and their small size are real advantages, and the structure from motion algorithms (SFM) allow accurate digital elevation models (DEM) and ortho-mosaic terrain models over large areas. Today UAVs are increasingly accessible and have widespread applications, such as in environmental monitoring systems for agroforestry, structural geology, archaeology, marine habitats, supervised hazards, and accidents [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39], and recently also in monitoring ML on the coast [40][41][42][43][44] or that floating in rivers [45]. These studies are not uniform with regard to the data processing procedures, ranging from visual interpretation of images [42] and analysis of the spectral profile of litter [46], to the use of machine learning methods [43,44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a further upgrade of the radar imaging system, the possibility of using a gimbal, as suggested in [41,42], will be considered to achieve major flexibility in the data acquisition. If the image plane coincides with the plane where the target is located, i.e., D 0 , the target is reconstructed at the correct position.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a further upgrade of the radar imaging system, the possibility of using a gimbal, as suggested in [41,42], will be considered to achieve major flexibility in the data acquisition.…”
Section: True Target Positionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost all of the studies/efforts are applied on a limited scale for testing and validation. Additionally, research efforts ( Liu et al, 2019b , Ardestani et al, 2016 , Raj et al, 2017 ; Pérez et al, 2019 ; Škorput et al, 2020 ) have proposed systems that are based on key modules such as: UAV flight planning and control Capturing video data from UAV on the accident site at various heights, angles Video data transfer mechanism to the ground station Image processing (rectification, mosaicking, 3D model generation and its optimization) System application and validation, Accuracy measurement framework. …”
Section: Road Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PSNR = 41.62. SSIM = 0.9475 (Indicate that quality is effective) Škorput et al (2020) Proposed method to use UAV photogrammetry to reconstruct traffic accident scene DJI Phantom 4 UAV, 3D and orthophoto computer models (No mention of specific package/algorithm) A simple accident scene for testing the method Error reported under −5% to +2% in several 3D model measurements from with real data Pérez et al (2019) Proposed method to use UAV photogrammetry to reconstruct traffic accident scene with a claim that it is low cost and simplified S500 Quadcopter, Gopro Hero 4 Black, Controller, GNSS Receiver, Ground control station, Monitor Agisoft Photoscan Pro along with manual tagging of 3 control points A simple accident scene for testing the method. Deployed at a height of 65 m Planimetric accuracy of 7.5 cm is obtained by using the ASPRS standard.…”
Section: Road Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%