The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2018.1446568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy and effectiveness of low cost UASs and open source photogrammetric software for foredunes mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
26
1
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
26
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering these possible technical and methodological differences, D rms values achieved in this study are very much in line with the expected performance of photogrammetric point clouds. In particular, the performance achieved in this study are better or very close to that of Mancini et al [39], Elsner et al [27] and Gonçalves et al [46] who also compared their photogrammetric point clouds with terrestrial or airborne laser scanner measurements. To be noted also is that E rms achieved by Laporte-Fauret et al [44] with 4 GCPs increases up to 0.5 m to 1.12 m (depending on the camera quality) as they compared their photogrammetric DEMs with 5 across-foredune GNSS profiles.…”
Section: Hybrid Uas-mls Performancesupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering these possible technical and methodological differences, D rms values achieved in this study are very much in line with the expected performance of photogrammetric point clouds. In particular, the performance achieved in this study are better or very close to that of Mancini et al [39], Elsner et al [27] and Gonçalves et al [46] who also compared their photogrammetric point clouds with terrestrial or airborne laser scanner measurements. To be noted also is that E rms achieved by Laporte-Fauret et al [44] with 4 GCPs increases up to 0.5 m to 1.12 m (depending on the camera quality) as they compared their photogrammetric DEMs with 5 across-foredune GNSS profiles.…”
Section: Hybrid Uas-mls Performancesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Similarly, authors using a greater number of GCPs, surveyed with a pole-mounted GNSS receiver, mostly compared GCPs' elevation with the elevation interpolated onto the photogrammetrically-derived DEMs [11,40,41,44]. When both laser (terrestrial or airborne) and photogrammetric data are available, a classic approach is to compare the respectively generated DEMs [27,39,46]. Such comparison implies a densification of the photogrammetric point cloud and, as pointed out by Elsner et al [27], may smooth differences compared to the comparison of raw point clouds.…”
Section: Hybrid Uas-mls Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vertical accuracy achieved in this work is also comparable with the results obtained from other similar UAS studies conducted under different geomorphologic settings (Table 4). For example, our results exceed those reported by Long et al [22], Gonçalves et al [24], and Tonkin et al [18] of 17 cm, 12 cm, and 51.7 cm vertical RMSE, respectively, and are similar to those reported by Gonçalves et al [20] of 2.7-4.6 cm vertical RMSE.…”
Section: Spatial Resolution and Vertical Accuracysupporting
confidence: 77%
“…With careful mission plan, flight execution and image processing, we obtained a dense cloud of 690 points/m 2 for the highest reconstruction quality. It is almost the same density as TLS point clouds (i.e., a mean density of 760 points/m 2 [24]), and denser than most of LiDAR point clouds (i.e., a density of 35 points/m 2 [37]). The dense cloud resulted in a 3.8-cm ultrahigh-resolution DSM.…”
Section: Spatial Resolution and Vertical Accuracymentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation