2009
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy analysis of three‐dimensional bone surface models of the forearm constructed from multidetector computed tomography data

Abstract: 3D bone models constructed from low-radiation dose CT data demonstrated the same level of accuracy as those constructed from normal-radiation dose data. The present simulation system can produce 3D bone models with one-thirtieth of the normal radiation dose in the forearm.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, regarding radiation exposure, our simulation system can produce 3-D bone models with low-dose radiation that is 30 of the normal radiation dose for the forearm [21]. We also plan to distribute our simulation system as commercial software in a few years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, regarding radiation exposure, our simulation system can produce 3-D bone models with low-dose radiation that is 30 of the normal radiation dose for the forearm [21]. We also plan to distribute our simulation system as commercial software in a few years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from this, the resolution of the image data used for planning and the subsequent segmentation process are additional technical factors, which may also influence the planning accuracy. Nevertheless, bone models extracted from CT scans with an axial resolution of 1 mm and using interactive segmentation methods, such as thresholding and region growing, have been shown to be sufficiently accurate for preoperative planning [54]. Intraoperatively, the correct placement of the guide(s) on the bone also has a major impact on the accuracy of the entire procedure, because the reduction is computed relative to the osteotomy site.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both forearms, from elbow to wrist, were scanned using CT using a low-dose technique (scan time, 0.5 seconds; slice thickness, 0.625 mm; 10 mA, 120 kV) [27] with a LightSpeed TM Ultra 16 CT scanner (General Electric, Waukesha, WI, USA) in three positions: maximum supination, neutral, and maximum pronation. Imaging was done with the patient in the prone position with the arms elevated above the head.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%