2011
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.84.041932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accumulation of swimming bacteria near a solid surface

Abstract: We measured the distribution of a forward swimming strain of Caulobacter crescentus near a surface using a three-dimensional tracking technique based on dark field microscopy and found that the swimming bacteria accumulate heavily within a micrometer from the surface. We attribute this accumulation to frequent collisions of the swimming cells with the surface, causing them to align parallel to the surface as they continually move forward. The extent of accumulation at the steady state is accounted for by balan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

10
121
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
10
121
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For suspensions in a bounded domain, the swimming cells accumulate near the surface, as observed for bacteria (Li et al 2011) and up-swimming, bottom-heavy algae (Pedley & Kessler 1992), two different cellular organisms with opposite swimming modes, one 'pushing' the other 'pulling'. Several experimental and theoretical studies of swimming particle interactions with surfaces show that the particle interaction with the wall can vary with particle size, swimming type and particle shape and the long time trajectory of a swimming particle moving near a surface is not easily predicted (Li et al 2011;Berke et al 2008;Spagnolie & Lauga 2012;Zhu, Lauga & Brandt 2013). While most of these studies were conducted for solid walls, the motion toward a stress free surface, such as an air and water interface, show some similarities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For suspensions in a bounded domain, the swimming cells accumulate near the surface, as observed for bacteria (Li et al 2011) and up-swimming, bottom-heavy algae (Pedley & Kessler 1992), two different cellular organisms with opposite swimming modes, one 'pushing' the other 'pulling'. Several experimental and theoretical studies of swimming particle interactions with surfaces show that the particle interaction with the wall can vary with particle size, swimming type and particle shape and the long time trajectory of a swimming particle moving near a surface is not easily predicted (Li et al 2011;Berke et al 2008;Spagnolie & Lauga 2012;Zhu, Lauga & Brandt 2013). While most of these studies were conducted for solid walls, the motion toward a stress free surface, such as an air and water interface, show some similarities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it did not require the presence of a nearby surface as evidenced by the uniform bacterial distribution in the absence of flow, in contrast to the known accumulation of motile cells arising from hydrodynamic 6 or short-range steric 7,8 interactions with boundaries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second mechanism involves hydrodynamic torques that arise in anisotropic bodies swimming in close contact with the wall and leading to swimming at a finite angle with the wall surface [22]. More recently, the role of hydrodynamic interactions has been questioned [24,25], suggesting that steric repulsion and rotational Brownian motion are enough to reproduce the observed accumulation of bacteria in the proximity of solid walls. Despite the extensive theoretical and numerous experimental works on the hydrodynamics of bacterial swimming, a straightforward, unambiguous, and direct identification of a main mechanism responsible for wall entrapment is still lacking.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%