1987
DOI: 10.1017/s0016672300026938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accumulation of mutations in sexual and asexual populations

Abstract: SummaryThe accumulation of beneficial and harmful mutations in a genome is studied by using analytical methods as well as computer simulation for different modes of reproduction. The modes of reproduction examined are biparental (bisexual, hermaphroditic), uniparental (selfing, automictic, asexual) and mixed (partial selfing, mixture of hermaphroditism and parthenogenesis). It is shown that the rates of accumulation of both beneficial and harmful mutations with weak selection depend on the within-population va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
135
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(25 reference statements)
7
135
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, theoretical studies have shown that slightly deleterious mutations accumulate at a faster rate in asexual genomes than in sexual genomes (38,39). However, if deleterious mutations accumulate continuously in a gene, the gene will eventually deteriorate and lose its original function (39)(40)(41). Note that here we are considering only the genes that still maintain the original function after 200 million or 1.5 billion years of endosymbiosis.…”
Section: Enhanced Mutation Rate and Relaxation Of Selection As Causesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, theoretical studies have shown that slightly deleterious mutations accumulate at a faster rate in asexual genomes than in sexual genomes (38,39). However, if deleterious mutations accumulate continuously in a gene, the gene will eventually deteriorate and lose its original function (39)(40)(41). Note that here we are considering only the genes that still maintain the original function after 200 million or 1.5 billion years of endosymbiosis.…”
Section: Enhanced Mutation Rate and Relaxation Of Selection As Causesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors (6)(7)(8)(9)(10) have suggested that the enhanced evolutionary rate observed in genes of Buchnera and organelles can be explained by Muller's ratchet (37,38), which refers to the event that deleterious mutations accumulate in asexual genomes because they cannot be eliminated through recombination. Indeed, theoretical studies have shown that slightly deleterious mutations accumulate at a faster rate in asexual genomes than in sexual genomes (38,39). However, if deleterious mutations accumulate continuously in a gene, the gene will eventually deteriorate and lose its original function (39)(40)(41).…”
Section: Enhanced Mutation Rate and Relaxation Of Selection As Causesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where X = 1 -(1//T) (Gabriel et al, in press;Haigh 1978;Pamilo et al 1987). In this formulation, the mean number of mutations (n) is assumed to be monitored on the adults in each generation that survive selection.…”
Section: An Analytical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon, now known as Muller's ratchet (Felsenstein 1974), has been subject to numerous theoretical studies with the objective of evaluating the rate at which mean population fitness decays under asexuality (Bell 1988a,b;Birky and Walsh 1988;Charlesworth 1990;Gabriel et al, in press;Haigh 1978;Kondrashov 1982Kondrashov , 1984Lynch and Gabriel 1990;Maynard Smith 1978;Melzer and Koeslag 1991;Pamilo et al 1987). But with few exceptions (Bell 1988a,b;Gabriel et al, in press;Lynch and Gabriel 1990;Melzer and Koeslag 1991), these studies have been pursued under the assumption that population size is unaffected by the accumulation of mutations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increasing p sex evidently increased the fixation probability of the sex modifier ( Figure 6). A low probability of sex has been proven to provide substantial benefits in terms of sex rate (Pamilo et al, 1987;Charlesworth et al, 1993;Green and Noakes, 1995;Barton and Charlesworth, 1998). Strong modifiers that substantially increased the sex rate exhibited a higher advantage than weak modifiers.…”
Section: Selection On a Recombination Modifiermentioning
confidence: 99%