2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0883-2927(02)00091-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accumulation chamber measurements of methane fluxes: application to volcanic-geothermal areas and landfills

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
40
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
7
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, by comparing 40 gas emissions present in the Tuscan Roman Degassing Structure, characterised by high gas flow rates (up to 360 t/day of CO 2 ) with a total gas flux higher than 1500 t/day (Chiodini et al, 2011), it can be noted that measured Rivara fluxes are not very high (289.70 t/day). Moreover, the comparison of the present CH 4 fluxes with those measured by Cardellini et al (2003) at Poggio dell'Olivo site (central Italy), reveals a very similar range of values (0.00-30.27 g/m 2 day and 0.004-47.71 g/m 2 day, respectively. Unfortunately, a comparison with CH 4 flux values measured in northern Italy is not possible, because different instruments, such as a gas chromatograph with a Flame Ionization Detector, and sampling density (76 points over 9000 km 2 ) have been used (e.g.…”
Section: Co 2 and Ch 4 Flux Measurementssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, by comparing 40 gas emissions present in the Tuscan Roman Degassing Structure, characterised by high gas flow rates (up to 360 t/day of CO 2 ) with a total gas flux higher than 1500 t/day (Chiodini et al, 2011), it can be noted that measured Rivara fluxes are not very high (289.70 t/day). Moreover, the comparison of the present CH 4 fluxes with those measured by Cardellini et al (2003) at Poggio dell'Olivo site (central Italy), reveals a very similar range of values (0.00-30.27 g/m 2 day and 0.004-47.71 g/m 2 day, respectively. Unfortunately, a comparison with CH 4 flux values measured in northern Italy is not possible, because different instruments, such as a gas chromatograph with a Flame Ionization Detector, and sampling density (76 points over 9000 km 2 ) have been used (e.g.…”
Section: Co 2 and Ch 4 Flux Measurementssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Such average values (<100 g/m 2 day) fit those estimated in other Italian sites (Chiodini et al, 1995(Chiodini et al, , 1998. No hints of deep degassing can be inferred for the study area, as in general has been observed in some DDS throughout Italy (Chiodini et al, 1995(Chiodini et al, , 1998(Chiodini et al, , 2008Chiodini and Frondini, 2001;Cardellini et al, 2003;Voltattorni et al, 2009;Quattrocchi et al, 2009Quattrocchi et al, , 2010Quattrocchi et al, , 2011. Neither a particular trend of /CO 2 enrichment, nor evident alignment of anomalies has been revealed during this survey, discounting any hypothesis of deeply-derived leakages in the area (Evans et al, 2001).…”
Section: Co 2 and Ch 4 Flux Measurementssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1b). In this area, a significant diffuse emission of CH 4 and C 6 H 6 related to the geogenic fluid source was also measured (Cardellini et al, 2003a;Castaldi and Tedesco, 2005;Tassi et al, 2012b). The flux of gases emitted from the soil, whose total amount is comparable with that discharged from the fumaroles , is orders of magnitude lower than the fumarolic one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The technique was then applied to detect methane microseepage in petroliferous basins (Klusman et al 2000;LTE 2007) and coal mines (Thielemann et al 2000), and gas exhalations in geothermal or volcanic areas (e.g., Hernandez et al 1998;Etiope 1999;Cardellini et al 2003). A wide array of reports of chamber measurements for methane fluxes in mud volcanoes and other types of seeps are currently available (e.g., Etiope et al 2004a, b;2011a, b;2013;Hong et al 2013).…”
Section: Soil-atmosphere Gas Flux Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%